| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Governors 2009/2010
Governor's races are odd birds. Of all the races I follow -- House, Senate, Presidential, even state legislative -- they tend to be the least partisan. The reasons are similar to the reasons that Presidential races often seem so issues-less, especially when compared to the legislative races: People don't look at their chief executive and see a bundle of issues; they see a leader. This is more pronounced at the local and state level, where they just see someone who fixes potholes and makes sure their kid gets funding for afterschool football.
On top of this, these races are going to be very much subject to the performance of the economy over the next few years. In 2002, Democrats and Republicans alike suffered as chief executives were forced to make cuts in state budgets during the 2000-2001 semi-recession. Given the full-blown recession/semi-depression we are likely headed towards, there could be a similar effect. Sarah Palin is still very popular in Alaska, but after she cuts education to keep the budget in balance, will she still be?
So anyway, theses are very preliminary. Right now if I had to guess, I'd say Republicans would net one or two Governor's mansions, bringing them to 23 or 24 seats. I've bolded the ones that I think seem especially primed to change hands.
Given the large number of open seats and undeclared candidates, I'm even less certain about these than the Senate ratings (which is pretty darned uncertain). This is especially true of open races that I've labelled uncompetitive, since really no one can call an open Governor's race uncompetitive this early. But just watch me. Because I'm dangerous like that.
More below the fold.
| Not Presently Competitive R | Potentially Competitive R | Competitive R | Competitive D | Potentially Competitive D | Not Presently Competitive D |
| AK-Gov | AL-Gov | CA-Gov | KS-Gov | IL-Gov | AR-Gov |
| FL-Gov | AZ-Gov | GA-Gov | ME-Gov | MD-Gov | CO-Gov |
| ID-Gov | CT-Gov | HI-Gov | MI-Gov | MA-Gov | IA-Gov |
| NE-Gov | SC-Gov | MN-Gov | OK-Gov | NJ-Gov | NH-Gov |
| TX-Gov | NV-Gov | PA-Gov | NY-Gov | NM-Gov | |
| VT-Gov | RI-Gov | TN-Gov | OH-Gov | ||
| SD-Gov | VA-Gov | OR-Gov | |||
| WI-Gov | |||||
| WY-Gov |
Not Presently Competitve R
AK-Gov: (Sarah Palin) Andrew Sullivan once fantasized that Sarah Palin would have trouble trying to survive in Alaska. It's a pipe dream. For the love of God, a convicted Republican felon nearly won re-election there, and Don Young ended up winning fairly handily. Fuggedaboudit.
FL-Gov: (Charlie Crist) Crist presently sports an approval rating of around 65%, which I'm sure he's out-and-out thrilled about. Normally a Florida race would be one that I would say could swing either way, but you have to like Crist's odds right now.
ID-Gov: (Butch Otter) This was close in 2006 when it was open, but it is hard to imagine it being close this time. Pretty much everyone except the Club for Growth hated Bill Sali, his opponent was a former Republican who campaigned on tax cuts, and he still only lost 51-49. As a complete aside . . . anyone else notice how all Idaho politicians seem to have names that sound vaguely like gay porn stars? Butch Otter, Dirk Kempthorne, Mike Crapo. The only one with a normal name was Larry Craig.
NE-Gov: (Open). You know, the thing I miss most about my old blog is coming up with childish comments about candidates with names like Dave Heineman, Chandler Woodcock, and Dave Heineman. I was crushed when Dick Swett didn't run for Senate in 2008. But whatever. The bottom line is, Democrats win the Nebraska Governor's office when Republican governors screw up or raise taxes. That hasn't happened here, and I think Obama's 45% is about the ceiling for Democrats right now. We'll see who get nominated.
Potentially Competitive R
AL-Gov: (Open). Bob Riley (teenage wasteland, whoa yeah) is term-limited. The Democratic bench in Alabama is pretty thin, but Democrats can still win in the state. Artur Davis is running, leaving a very uncompetitive open seat in AL-07, but given how Obama went over here I'll believe it when I see it. I'll wait and see who the Republicans put up, but you'd have to like their odds of holding on.
AZ-Gov (Brewer). This state is trending Democrat more slowly than people think, and many of the recent gains in Congress have been due to local conditions. We actually had a decent year in the statehouse in 2008. I don't know how good a pol Brewer is, and the Republican legislature might push through some divisive stuff that hurts her popularity, but for now, there's only the potential for competition here.
CT-Gov (Rell). Rell no longer sports an approval rating of 105% like she did in the 2006 cycle, but she's still pretty darned popular. She's apparently revving up the re-election campaign, and it is pretty hard to imagine her being defeated. But it is still Connecticut.
SC-Gov (Open). I really have a hard time seeing this being all that competitive after the last couple of open Senate races, but Dems have won the governor's mansion in recent years. We'll see how recruiting goes, but you have to like the GOP's odds.
TX-Gov (Perry). If Perry runs again, I think this will be a tough race for the GOP. I'm not sure that Texans want 14 years of Rick. If he retires or loses in the primary to Kay Bailey Hutchison, its less competitive. You'll hear a lot of noise about the race from the Kossacks, just like you did in 2002, and just like you did about beating Cornyn.
VT-Gov (Douglas). He still continues to be popular, and has won in some horrendous Republican years. If he retires or runs for Senate, I would imagine that the Dems will get this one back.
Competitive R
CA-Gov (Open). You have to like DiFi's odds of winning the seat she lost to Pete Wilson 20 years ago. Still, there are some potentially serious candidates on the Republican side. Two surprising facts about California: Democrats have only controlled the Governor's mansion for 20 of the last 110 years, and no Democrat not named "Brown" has served two full terms since the 1850s. These are the types of things I carry around in my head, people.
GA-Gov (Open). I think there will be some type of a competitive race here. Some brilliant-sounding guy named John Oxendine is in the running, but there might be a nasty primary between him and Light Governor Casey Cagle. Dems have a former General/Labor Commissioner, who could help them get rural whites back.
HI-Gov (Open). Popular Governor Linda Lingle will be term limited. It's hard to see how Republicans keep this; the cupboard is pretty bare there.
MN-Gov (T-Paw (?)). Pawlenty can run again, or he can concentrate on a Presidential bid, or try to do both. Democrats have been shut out of the Governor's mansion for 20 years here, so you'd have to like their odds in an open race. Either way, unless the brand makes a comeback here, expect a competitive race either way.
NV-Gov (Gibbons (?)). Governor Gibbons is mired in all manner of scandals, and has an approval rating in the 40s. There's even a recall effort going on. Not looking good for him. Right now it is looking like Republicans' best chance is to prim
RI-Gov (Open). Republicans have managed to hold the Governor's mansion for 16 years in what is arguably the bluest state in the nation. You'd have to think their run is about to end, now that Democrats have stopped running Myrth York.
SD-Gov (Open). Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin may be making a run for an executive slot, in which case you have to think this is a pretty competitive race, even in a very red state.
Competitive D Races
KS-Gov (Open) -- Sam Brownback is running for Governor. He's reasonably popular, and will be running in a very red state where Democrats don't have much of a base. Hard to see this not being at least competitive for Republicans.
ME-Gov (Open) -- I know, I know. But the GOP actually probably would have won here in 2006 of all years if they hadn't nominated a social conservative (in Maine of all places). It's a quirky state, so I say competitive.
MI-Gov (Open) -- It's been rough in Michigan, but Republicans have a couple of statewide figures in Mike Cox and Terri Lynn Land, which pretty much guarantees at least a competitive race. Granholm isn't particularly popular, so that won't help any.
OK-Gov (Open) -- Governor Henry is term-limited in a state that has been steadily trending Republican, even in the last few years. Dan Boren has said he won't run for Governor this cycle, so you have to like the Republicans' odds, assuming that this time around there's no cockfighting referndum on the ballot and we don't nominate a Christian conservative candidate who explodes in an on-camera bust of profanity right before the election. Regardless, this will almost certainly be competitive.
PA-Gov (Open) -- The Democrats' bench is surprsingly thin here, and Republicans have a good number of candidates with statewide experience. This should make for a good race.
TN-Gov (Open) -- This state swung heavily to Republicans in 2008. The awesomely-named Republican Congressman Zach Wamp is considering running. Have to like his odds, especially with Harold Ford Jr. tied up at the DLC.
VA-Gov (Open (?)) -- Are the Democrats really going to nominate Terry McAuliffe? Really?? Maybe there is a God. Anyway, the Republicans have been having problems in the state lately, to say the least, but they have an articulate candidate who will be difficult to beat, while the Democrats will be having a primary among three pretty mediocre candidates. If Tim Kaine is escorted off to some cabinet position, there won't be much to stop a Republican rebound here (yes, I know he can't run, but he wouldn't be spending a whole lot of time on the campaign trail like Mark Warner did for him during his 2005 comeback).
WI-Gov (Doyle (?)) -- Governor Jim Doyle seems bound and determined to run for re-election, but he only got 53% of the vote in 2006, and he's got a pretty mediocre 49-47% approval rating. Definitely vulnerable against the right Republican.
WY-Gov (Open) -- If you know anything at all about politics, you'll understand this rating.
Potentially Competitive Seats
IL-Gov (Blago (?)) -- Assuming he's not in prison, Governor Blago is free to run for re-election. If he is, or if he doesn't run, Democrats' odds improve markedly. Even then Republicans have to field a candidate, which will be no small task here.
MD-Gov (O'Malley) -- Marty O'Malley doesn't have a particularly high approval rating; earlier this year he was actually less popular than Bush. But unless Former Governor Ehrlich makes a go of it, this won't be competitive. O'Malley's ratings have improved of late, so maybe even then . . .
MA-Gov (Patrick) -- Patrick has succeded in getting his approval rating up to 51% in MA. If he continues, he'll be impossible to defeat. If not, he still might be impossible to defeat. The cupboard is pretty bare for Republicans in a very blue state.
NJ-Gov (Corzine) -- New Jersey always seems to play Lucy to the GOP's Charlie Brown. But once again, polling shows a competitive race for a fairly unpopular Democratic incumbent. The US Attorney for NJ is in the race, and is running pretty close to Corzine, who is at 42%.
NY-Gov (Patterson) -- A lot depends on whether or not Rudy runs. If he does, it could be close, though Patterson will probably have to make a mistake that puts a dent in his 59% approval rating.
OH-Gov (Strickland) -- Strickland sports a tepid 45% approval rating in this swing state, which pretty much automatically puts him on the watch list. With the trouble the economy is likely to go through in the next few years, I'd be sweating it if I were him. The GOP has had a rough go the last few years, and only holds one statewide office right now: Auditor.
OR-Gov (Open) -- Gov. Kulongoski leaves office and isn't terribly popular. The Dems have controlled the Governor's office since the 1986 elections, which would seem to open them up to a "change" campaign. But the Republican cupboard is pretty bare here. Secretary of State Bradbury will be a good candidate for the Democrats in a state that ain't getting any redder these days.
Not Presently Competitive D
AR-Gov (Beebe) -- 75% approval rating. It's a red state at the Presidential level, but as blue as Massachusetts at the state level, for historic reasons (AR didn't have a populist/establishment split in its Democratic party in the 30s and 40s, so the Republicans didn't have a faction to take over in the 50s and 60s). Better off concentrating on Senator Lambert-Lincoln.
CO-Gov (Ritter) -- Not above 70% anymore, but still 2:1 approving.
IA-Gov (Culver) -- Chet's well above 50%, and this state has trended blue of late.
NH-Gov (Lynch) -- So like, you know how if you play in 3d edition Dungeons & Dragons and your character can attain Godhood eventually? Er . . . me neither. But if that were the case, I think it would pretty much describe Governor Lynch's standing in New Hampshire.
NM-Gov (Open) -- The Republicans got wiped out here in 2008. Not gonna happen.
And now I'll return to playing with my Star Wars action figures. Pkew-Pkew! Look out Han Solo! It's IG-88 and Zuckuss!!!


Comments
Illinois
To show you just how bad things are for our party here, it's worth noting that on November 4, 2008 one man had a 13% approval rating, his party won a few seats in the state house.
On November 4th a man had a 26% approval rating, his party picked up 20 seats in congress and was thrown out of power.
Leader A, is our governor, leader B is george w. bush. The party here is in terrible shape but if it had a pulse, next year would be an amazing year to put together a fresh new team.
I hope the rest of you have better chances.
Sigh, Illinois
It's really amazing how incompetent our party is at the state level nowadays. We could really use new blood, especially the kind that has political experience and not dairy distribution experience (nobody likes you, Oberweis).
So Palin and Crist run for re-election
and then after winning easily in their two states, announce within three months that they are running for president? Would Pawlenty really not run for re-election?
Any thoughts about Jindal's vulnerability in 2011? That he would be up for re-election in an odd year almost certainly precludes a presidential run if he wants to run as governor as well.
Yeah
Because there's a chance Pawlenty could lose in 2010. Unless there's something he really wants to accomplish, I don't see how why he runs.
I really think Jindal is more of a 2016 candidate if Obama wins re-election.
Re: Pawlenty
The reason I think he'll run again for governor is that he'll need something to do if he fails to win the nomination; I guess you are arguing that it would be too big of a risk for him to run a tough re-election campaign in 2010 as a loss would embarrrass him to the point where he couldn't run for president.
Maneuvering
I think it would fare to say that if Pawlenty doesnt run for the governorship you could expect to see a announcent for the presidency shortly after his replacement is named. (agreeing with you) And, I think it would hard to win a third term in a state that doesnt seem to like republicans to much these days.
Thoughts on having a advantage in Iowa due to geography?
We're diverging off topic
But I can see Paws just pandering hard on the ethanol/farm stuff and yes, taking advantage of his proximity to Iowa in order to rebut the disadvantage that he'll have among white evangelicals against Palin, if such a matchup ever occurred (she's probably why McCain performed just as well among white evangelicals against Obama as Bush did against Kerry in 2004 despite the fact that Iowans hate McCain and Obama spent a lot of time and money courting that vote). Hopefully, Paws and Palin wouldn't bloody each other up too badly as neither probably has much love for the other. I can see Crist and Romney pulling a McCain and skipping the state while camping out in New Hampshire.
I am hoping that Mike Huckabee just goes away. This guy is a one-stool republican. We could use more three-stool republicans.
I believe Pawlenty will run for pres and has a good shot at
winning the nomination. MN dems have an large field of strong candidates for gov in 2010. Pawlenty would have a tough race and can't see why he would want a third term. I see Pawlenty as just the candidate to unite many factions within the republican party and draw support from moderates. His record shows he is pretty strong fiscal conservative (although not pure or extreme enough for the far right on no new taxes.) He is also social conservative who attends the largest evangelical church in the twin cities but doesn't talk about in his religion in a way that turns off moderate, independent or even progressive voters. Being from the opposite end of religious/political spectrum I'm only guessing, but I think he'd do better with soc conservatives in Iowa than Palin. He is smart, has integrity and his low key folksy style and blue collar upbringing works well for him in connecting with voters (has high fav ratings here in spite of his too conservaitve fiscal policies.) If he runs I'd cross over vote for him. (in a primary) He is not moderate enough for me, but he appears the best of the potential GOP candidates so far and I like the opposing candidate on the ballot to be one I could live with rather than fear his/her victory,
It'd be a fun race in Iowa
between Pawlenty and Palin and a pretty even one for the reasons you mention. It's been awhile since we've had a competitive race in the Iowa primaries on our side. Paws may actually be the favorite in such a contest just b/c he's more likely to pander on issues of ethanol and farm subsidies than the lady (taking a page out of the Obama playbook). Throw in Huckster, and Palin could get cock-blocked. Romney or Newt would be the equivalent cockblock for Pawlenty but then again, both of those guys may just bail on Iowa and fight it out with Crist in New Hampshire.
You are right though that Paws' situation is dramatically different from either Crist or Palin in terms of running for re-election; losing in Minnesota would be embarrasing before a run for president. Iowa and Minnesota could be targets in 2012 if moral values becomes one of the top three issues (Ginsburg retiring in Obama's first term would help us tremendously) and foreign policy falls out of the picture given the anti-war presence in both states. Look at the Minnesota exit poll numbers on the economy, McCain and Palin performed pretty well when compared to other states (only losing on that issue 53-46). It seems that there's an anti-government streak in Minnesota and Iowa except on the issue of farm subsidies and ethanol.
PA Gov
AG Tom Corbett is the strongest GOP candidate, perhaps the strongest statewide Republican in years. He's the only other Republican besides Arlen Specter this decade to break through in the Philly suburbs.
The top Dem names mentioned are based out west, which also may give the GOP an advantage. Dan Onorato, Allegheny County Chief Executive, forfeited much of his popularity by endorsing the very controversial drink tax. Lesson one for politicians: don't have visible tax increases on alcohol. Plus, he's rather unknown out east. Jack Wagner, a former state senator turned statewide official, might actually have a better chance, but he still is low profile.
onorato is forfeiting the rest of his popularity
with the transit lockout.
New York
I have no idea what Rudy's gubanatorial platform would look like, so I won't comment on his potential candidacy. I will say that Gov. Patterson has risen to the occasion here in NY. He is trying desperately to make the citizens and legislature aware of the need for painful spending cuts across the Board. The Dems in the legislature are sitting back quietly and seeing if he gets any traction. What do the "republican" senators do? Oppose the governor's spending cuts to gain political points with the employee and health care unions - of course! (sigh). Only on Planet Albany.
Maine
I ran for office in Maine folks (state house in a heavily dem district), and I can say without a SHADOW of a doubt that the Republicans are taking the Blaine House in 2010 in Maine. They have a crop of actually good candidates - and my money is on Rick Bennett if he throws his hat in the ring. Young, conservative but not scary to the moderates... attractive and a hell of a campaigner... former President of the Senate... he has it all, and Maine didn't like Baldacci much, and hasn't elected a Republican in a while, but would have in 2006 if the Republicans hadn't nominated that idiot Chandler Woodcock.
Hell, Peter Ciancette almost won in 2002, and he was running against a very popular Congressman who had spent like two years camping out in the first district.
If the Republicans don't take the Maine Governor's mansion in 2010, I swear to god I'll eat my tie... on youtube...
PA et al.
I don't know if corbett wants to run. Remember hearing he was not a particularly ambitious candidate. I suspect someone like Bill Scranton may take another run at it, or even (concievably) Mike Turzai. Another guy to watch is Todd Platts (congressmen from my home district). Decently solid conservative, but wins 90 percent in his district (yeah, it's a red district, but it does include the city of York). As for the Democrats, don't count Casey out. I'm serious. Everyone in the state knows governor's the job he really wants. I could see Obama appointing him to something, Rendell filling his seat with someone else (his wife for example0 and Casey running for governor in 2010. Also don't count out party switcher Barbara Hafer, or 2004 senate candidate Joe Hoffel.
NJ is one of those races we really really should win. Calling Corzine a terrible governor just somehow doesn't fully express how bad he is, and how unpopular. This sadly doesn't mean we'll actually pul it off however.
I wonder if either Mark Kennedy or (if he loses the senate race or has it stolen) Norm Coleman might possibly take a shot at the MN governor's mansion if T-Paw retires. I'd love to see Michelle Bachman do it, or maybe go for senate in 2012.
Everything I have heard
is that Corbett is angling for a run at Governor. Bill Scranton may or may not get into it, but he has tried a few times before in the past and hasn't gotten anywhere.
I can't believe you threw out Mike Turzai's name. He's the state rep two townships over from where I live. He's virtually unknown in the more western parts of the North Hills, let alone the entire state. He's a good guy by the way.
Of course Casey could have whatever he wants. The Caseys are golden gods in PA.
Hafer and Hoeffel are weak candidates. Hafer got 32% of the vote in 1990 when she was the GOP Governor candidate against Casey's father.
Please No
I doubt Bachmann can win a statewide race in Minnesota, for a number of reasons. One is that she barely won the conservative 6th district. But the main is that she's *insane*. I don't mean the religious extremist sense, though she has that covered, I mean the complete nutcase sense. Her narcissism is so great that she regularly says and does outrageous things just to get people to pay attention to her. The "anti-American" thing was just the latest example, but how about saying she'd kiss Obama if he won? Cynical sensationalism. She's bragged about kissing Bush on the radio more than once since that creepy incident.
She might seem like a breath of fresh air to those of you not living in Minnesota, but trust me, she has no chance outside of her district. It's not even a question of politics, it's the mountains of footage of her acting like a complete lunatic.
this is from an alt weekly in Minneapolis, so it's obviously on the other side of the political spectrum, but they've been covering Bachmann for a long time and there's some pretty outrageous stuff in here.
http://www.citypages.com/2006-10-04/news/the-chosen-one
Colorado
Have to disagree with your assessment about Colorado. Everyone I talk to in GOP circles is eyeing Ritter as a vulnerable incumbent in 2010, which is seen as especially unusual in a state that rarely has a one-term chief exec.
The popularity rating you sited is 3 months old, and even at that the highest I've seen for Ritter in months. Ritter also staked political capital on a ballot initiative that would raise severance taxes on oil and gas producers during troubling economic times, and voters repudiated him fairly soundly. There's more, but I'll spare you the details. (see http://chieftain.com/articles/2008/10/24/news/local/doc490161e779c254357...)
Anyway, this race should AT LEAST be in the "Potentially Competitive" category.
Admittedly, there's not a long list of Republicans right now mentioned. But a few strong names are in the running (http://rockymountainright.com/?q=node/450) & an ex-Bronco or two. Of course, in the unlikely scenario that the GOP nominates Tom Tancredo, your initial ranking of the state is entirely accurate.
You underestimate Sen. Ted
You underestimate Sen. Ted Stevens' support. Remember that Colin Powell testified under oath to Stevens "integrity," "sterling" reputation, as "being someone whose word you could rely on," and "a guy who, as we said in the infantry, we would take on a long patrol." The Democratic Senator from Hawaii and Medal of Honor recipient Daniel Inouye also testified to Stevens good character.
So, if the voters of Alaska are dopes for almost re-electing a convicted felon, what does that make Powell (who also endorsed Obama) and Inouye since they actually testified to avert that conviction?
As to Oregon's chance for a change, the rising unemployment rate currently at 7.3% (up almost 1% from September to October) and the lack of Democratic ideas on how to increase job opportunities other than through "green" jobs and public works, leaves the door ajar for Republicans. Especially a young gun like Jason Atkinson. Bradbury is not particularly popular (having lost to Gordon Smith by 16 points in 2002), and has no personal charisma. Though he has already announced that he will be a candidate, I expect another Democrat will be the party's nominee.
It makes powell and inouye
blithering idiots.
At least the good people of Alaska have the excuse that they didn't know Stevens was convicted.
(ask the people that can see Russia -- Palin who? How's governor Murkowski doing?)
Totally not kidding about this, they don't have TV or newspapers out there in the boondocks.
very uninformed electorate.
GA and TN
Speaking as a Georgian going to school in Tennessee
As far as Georgia goes, either Oxendine or Cagle can beat the Democrat. Oxendine has name recognition out the whazoo, and Cagle is popular. Republicans should hold this office that was always supposed to be Democratic.
Tennessee has the opportunity to elect a Republican to the governor's office, continuing both with the pattern of never electing someone of the same party as the incumbent to the position as well as the trend toward Republicans we saw in the Assembly elections of 2008. Wamp is popular in his district and would appeal to many Tennesseans. This is an office Republicans ought to win, and they should work hard to do so.
Wisconsin
It is going to take a special breed of Republican to win a statewide election in Wisconsin. There is a significant split between the Republicans in the souteast part of the state and the rest of the state, which essentially mirrors the national split between conservatives and "moderates" (only without the religious component).
Given that only two Republicans have won a major-office statewide race (President, Governor, Senator, Attorney General) in the last 20 years (and I consider the second a fluke more due to a major miscalculation by the Democrats than by anything JB Van Hollen and his campaign team did in 2006), and that Doyle has complete control over the electoral process after demonstrating his willingness to corrupt the previous guardians, the only way I see a Republican competitive is if Doyle does take the next plane to DC to avoid the
$3$5$5.4 billion hole in the next biennial budget.All that said, I believe one of two Republicans can win - Scott Walker (currently Milwaukee County executive and previously a state Representative) and Paul Ryan (Congressman in the 1st District). The problem is Walker was shoved aside in the pre-planning of 2006 in favor of northeast Wisconsin Congressman Mark Green, and Ryan is on track to challenge Russ Feingold for his seat the same year.
Ohio
I suspect the Ohio governor's race will change to toss-up to leans GOP the minute John Kasich announces his candidacy. I wrote here that I thought he'd be a great VP choice. Now I'm thankful he wasn't picked, partially because we were introduced to Gov. Palin, partially because he was able to focus on rebuilding the Ohio GOP brand.
South Carolina
South Carolina's 2010 governor's race will not be competitive at all. The Dems have only one statewide elected official who is the Superintendent of Education. The GOP two term Attorney General, Henry McMaster, will probably be South Carolina's next governor.
Governors
The guy I think that the leadership of the party needs to talk to is Gov Mitch Daniels of Indiana. I know Indiana is a traditional Red State but I think a Gov Daniels would be competitive in most of these races.