| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Is there still a chance for McCain?
Late in the week, John McCain's campaign issued a farcical statement, with my highlighting below:
Instead of acknowledging the real differences that exist in this election, Barack Obama is using America's economic crisis to deflect legitimate criticisms of himself and his record. Now, more than ever, Americans should be scrutinizing Barack Obama's role in shielding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from increased regulation. Voters deserve a real debate about Barack Obama's proposals for one trillion dollars in new government spending and tax increases on small businesses – when Americans can afford neither. At a time when hardworking families face uncertainty and a historic decision in November, they expect more than Barack Obama's self-interested calls to stifle any inquiry into his record or his past.
This is not going to win the election. Saying "ignore the sinking economy, note the guy behind the curtain" is not going to work when people in all socio-economic locations are worried about the economies in their own ways, whether it is paying the mortgage, the credit card, putting food on the table, paying the rent, eyeballing the 401(k) or whatever.
The fact is, people, more than anything else, want leadership on the economy. Charlie Crist's political advisor nails it, ``But I think McCain still has a very good chance of winning Florida. Whichever candidate has a better economic plan is going to be the winner.''
McCain needs a two part strategy, but he can only execute one part. He needs to deliver a plausible economic plan that addresses the needs of America. I am a fan of tax cuts, but more tax cuts probably aren't the answer.
The answer is probably something like some strategy for recapitalizing some banks -- but letting others fall, while protecting deposits--, some supply-side stimulus, and helping some people with their mortgages. And probably more. Some of it needs to address real problems, some needs to address real pain, and some needs to address the news cycle.
Whatever the plan is, the campaign needs surrogates ready to explain it, unlike the mortgage plan "announced" at the last debate when Mitt Romney couldn't articulate it. (not that he wants to. Instead, he is raising money for himself) The think-tanks need to engage. People on Wall Street need to buy in to defending it. Etc.
And then, once McCain has articulated a credible position on the economy, outside groups need to attack on Ayers, Wright, and all the other cultural symbols that will alienate voters from Obama.
Right now, McCain's problem, captured so beautifully in the statement at the beginning of this post is that he's trying to beat something with nothing. Right now, the average undecided American cannot figure out what John McCain would do about the economy. The campaign isn't giving that voter the opportunity to have doubts about Obama, because McCain's non-message on the economy is self-disqualifying.
There is partly a theme here. Outsiders are necessary as surrogates to provide either defense or attack. McCain needs to be articulating his positive message for America and other people need to providing defense of that and attack on Obama's policies. At the same time, outside groups need to be dismantling Obama's personal image and narrative.
I suspect that none of this will happen. But right now, the blame does not lie totally with the McCain campaign. Business will be severely damanged by an Obama presidency and they are doing nothing about it. The think tanks are not attacking Obama's plans. They will get audited out of existence. The fact is that the only outside groups that are actually doing their part are the social conservative groups who are running ads about the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, judges, etc.
- Soren Dayton's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
What's Obama's plan?
I still don't know what Obama's plan ifor the economy is other than raising taxes.
Just in the last 2 weeks the dynamic has changed drastically...
...all of a sudden folks are worried about their jobs. They're watching their employers stock price plummet and most realize what the next step will be; " when will the pink slips start to go out?" So its about JOBS! Not the fake/artificial jobs that Barrack Obama is promising but real solid jobs. And most people know that only the GOP can fill that order.
McCain and other GOP candidates need to start talking about the high paying jobs that domestic oil production will bring and pose the question, "why are dems standing in the way of these high paying energy related jobs?" Secondly, McCains plan to build dozens and dozens of Nuclear Power plants which will create more high paying jobs. Another area that is important is Agri-Business jobs. Grain prices are up and the U.S. is the largest exporter of grain in the world. That translates into high paying Agri-Biz related jobs.
"We Americans can work our way out of this financial mess that the democrats have gotten us in! Just give us good jobs." This is a positive message and the democrats are really afraid to talk about it. Mostly because they're so anti-big oil and because of their anti-nuclear/Yucca Mtn reputation. If McCain and other GOP candidates would shout this "JOBS" message from the rooftops over the next 3 weeks they might have a chance. Darvin Dowdy
It's about the GOP and JOBS now?
GW Bush finished his first term without creating a single new job, and we have lost close to a million jobs just in the last 12 months.
Oil production and nuclear plants will not bring the millions of new jobs we need in the next 18 months. Obama's plan to create alternative-energy industry jobs and fund infrastructure WPA-style jobs will.
So THAT is his plan
He's going to bring back 70 year old New Deal programs? Won't he have to raise taxes even more to do that?
And what exactly would qualify as an alternative energy job?
Maybe this is socialism after all....
McCotter said it: "Green Jobs = Unemployment"
You have to train a workforce in those alternative energy jobs. Those jobs right now are merely research jobs, which do not produce anything of value.
Oil rigs need to be built. Nuclear plants need to be built. 16 new COLs (construction and operating licenses) have been filed with the NRC. If these licenses are approved without interference from the stupid Greens, then the plants will be built. No sane company wants to build a plant if it going to blocked/stalled by environ-wackos who want to go back to 1699.
Training a Workforce
Hmmm.. Which candidate has a plan to invest in America's college-bound young people and help them get the skills and knowledge they will need to work at new jobs?
Obama.
Those jobs are not just research jobs. New, efficient, high-wattage, low-cost solar panels have to be designed, engineered, built, sold, shipped and stocked and warehoused, re- sold, delivered, installed, and serviced. New geo-thermal heat pumps the same. New wind turbines the same.
Any American machinist or mechanic or installer from Detroit or Akron or Scranton's dismantled assembly lines has the mechanical and electronic and computer know-how and skills to assemble and package a wind turbine or a geo-thermal heat pump or a pellet-stove or a hybrid-technology biofuel home heating plant. right now.
How stupidly Conservative do you have to be to write that "... research jobs do not produce anything of value"??
This is the reason why Conservatives are going to be as irrelevant to Americans as the mid-19th Century Know-Nothing Party in future Politics.
These gov't created jobs will have to be paid for...
...by us taxpayers. The high paying jobs I'm speaking of (above post) will be created and paid for by the evil Big Business. Now the tax payers just finished paying out $700 billion + losing 75% of their retirement because of you democrats "fling w/socialism" over the past decade. Do you think we want to pay for Barry O's pie-in-the-sky greenie jobs, the by products of which no one wants?
JDandy get used to seeing the good old internal combustion engine around for decades to come. Every where I go in this great land I see folks, to this day, that have a real love affair with cars, suv's, off road vehicles, Harley's, riding lawnmowers and even chain saws! All powered by internal combustion engines! That run on petrol fuel or flex fuels. I don't see any of the above being powered by solar panels. JDandy, if you and the dem's think you're going force people to start going from point A to point B in some electric powered crap, you'd better think again. Of course you people, in essence, want to create a totalitarian state the dictates what people can do or think. That's your end goal. Control and power is what you _____ democrats are after. DD
Combustion
I just saw a car on TV powered by oil from the french-fry vats at a McDonald's. I just saw a hybrid Prius go by, and my neighbor told me that Honda and Toyota dealers are charging thousands above sticker for hybrids, they have to ration them out to dealers, and they are sold before they ever make it out to the showroom. We have to get off oil, and we have the technology today to run cars on other fuels.
Oil is a NON-RENEWABLE resource, and all Petroleum research I've seen says all the oil that's easy to get has been got. We haven't discovered a sizable oil deposit anywhere in the Continental US for over 75 years. Our national oil production reached its peak in the 70's, and we have been tapping out our reserves and buying foreign oil since.
T. Boone Pickens has it right: We only have about 5% of the world's proven reserves remaining, yet we are annual consumers of 25% of the total output. This should tell anyone with half a brain that we cannot drill our way out of our Energy problems.
We need serious research and infrastructure investment from now until we are once again energy-self-sufficient. Only one candidate has said they are ready to do that.
Obama.
Darvin, Have You Been Huffing Gas Again?
Are you living on the same planet we are? What part of Oil being a non-renewable resource don't you 'get'?
Even better is the fact that electric drive trains are inherently more simple and efficient that combustion drive trains. When, not if, the energy densities of current battery technologies are improved (Nano-tube cells and Caps show a lot of near term promise), an electrical drive train will stomp a combustion drivetrain into the ground. How do you think the modern freight train is powered? They have a diesel on 'em to generate electrical current for their batteries and drive trains...
We have got to repower america with a system that is more internally sustainable. Right now, it looks as though electrically driven systems are the best way.
I want to know how you equate energy independance and common sense with totalitarianism?
No one is ordering you to use electrical locomotion over chemical locomotion. However, America's collective 'pocket book' is and has been strongly suggesting that we switch for quite some time now. 20 years from now, when I am rocketing past your combustion rig with my electric or next gen rig, it will be because I believe in utilizing whatever means gives me the best performance coupled with the best economy. Nothing more. It will not be due to the 'Boogie Man', or some other such nonsense.
Keep shielding yourself with your ignorance though. I'm sure you'll continue to go far...
Squirrel and Dandy, its about perfomrance...
...well I drive 2000-3000 miles per month throughout the 4th largest city in the nation. If that qualifies me. Its about performance down here in Houston. Unlike Squirrel and Dandy who probably drive their little electric cars to the park and sit and do their knitting "together", we here in Texas have a purpose in life. We need to get from point A to point B in a timely manor. We like a soot belching vehicle with some muscle that will also haul a ton or 2. And we have not been duped into believing the lose theory that blames mankind for cyclical climate change. Oh sorry Squirrel and Dandy! Didn't mean to upset you. You might find it soothing to go rearrange your doilies or inventory your linens. Now, now. Shhhhh..... Haaaa! DD
Paying Illegals to build things wont help economy
Jim Dandy,
Senator Obama's energy policy looks like a term paper written by an Ivy leaguers. The author justed pulled it out of his ass. Also, how is borrowing money to pay illegal aliens to build things doing to help the economy.
While the Obama ADministration maintains an open borders and unlimited immigration policy, make work programs will pay illegals who will then use their pay to buy things made in China.
Dunno why you're so down on
Dunno why you're so down on Ivy Leaguers, I went to the same school Obama attended, and I can tell you we didn't "pull things out of our ass", but our professors were very strict and took no shit.
Immigration policy is complicated. You know who hires and enables illegals to work in our country? Yup.. American businesses. How do you solve that??
Make work programs will put money on the street, in the hands of people who will buy clothes at Wal-Mart, meals at local restaurants, cars and service from local dealers, into the hands of people who will spend the money in local towns and local businesses.
Not into short-selling Goldman-Sachs.
If your professors were strict
they'd have taught you "make work jobs" are a net economic drain from more productive uses of labor and capital.." Make -work jobs" by definition, do not add value to the economy in long term return on invested capital. I suppose making someone push a rake for a few hours beats just giving him a check, but not by much.
See, had you attended a big eastern jock college, not some haughty snobarama, you would know this.
Definition of make-work jobs
If used wisely, they can provide needed maintenance of existing infrastructure, and to the development of new infrastructure rollouts.
How are we going to provide the 21st century technologies of gigabit ethernet, N-band wireless, and fiber-optic backbone links to all our nation's schools, government buildings, and commercial hubs? Infrastructure.
If you had bothered attending class, instead of spending your time in your jockarama college dorm room playing Madden football on your X-Box in your pajamas, you would know this.
Ironman, You Drive Around on 'Make Work Jobs'...
As long as your 'Make Work Jobs' are creating, maintaining or improving the country's infrastructure, they aren't a net drain. America's Highway system is case in point...
I don't think that anyone here is saying that 'more landscaping' is what is needed to cure America's ills... Ironman, obviously your education hasn't stopped you from pulling stuff out of your ass.
I sorta know the difference
If the project was important to maintaining the transportation system, by definition it would not be a "make work job" and would already be in the project pipeline of the state DOTs.
Instead of anal insults perhaps you could explain how engineering projects which in today's world require close to a decade of lead time (thanks to such progressive initiatives as EIS studies; MBE compliance and "community outreach") are supposed to address the immediate weaknesses in the American economy.
No, what Obamanomics will be is to hire hordes of "community activists" to maybe paint houses or some other labor intensive activity which will have the obvious impact of adding foot soldiers for the '10 and '12 election cycles. We are talking Boss Tweed here, not Robert Moses.
Thinking That Far Ahead Would Be a Refreshing Change, Huh!
"If the project was important to maintaining the transportation system, by definition it would not be a "make work job" and would already be in the project pipeline of the state DOTs."
That assumption is why America's infrastructure (Transportation wise) is in the dumps. Just because there 'are' projects in the pipeline, doesn't mean they are 'good' projects... Project Justification and Planning Requirements are good things as long as they are not overly cumbersome.
I didn't read Jim's comments as advocating 'busy work', I read them as Public Works type projects. Maybe I missinterpreted them...
I would advocate public works projects aimed at improving the country's infrastructure. Putting some resources and effort into projects that will pay off 5, 10, 15, or 20+ years down the road is exactly what America has put off for the last few decades. We need to start thinking in radical ways about the long term goals. Those thoughts need to be focused around setting an example for other countries by operating the country in a more efficient manner. This means reducing waste (Pollution) and becoming an energy producer (Independance) for the world. We need to have some aggressive space exploration goals again as well. It all comes down to re-investing in America. Research grants are also a part of that.
"No, what Obamanomics will be is to hire hordes of "community activists" to maybe paint houses or some other labor intensive activity which will have the obvious impact of adding foot soldiers for the '10 and '12 election cycles."
Did you see this listed specifically in his economics plan? I must have missed it.
I recommend McCain specifically outlines these key areas:
Based on "man on the street interviews" shown on Fox, plus my experiences with co-workers, family members, friends and observations in general (not scientific but better than a sharp poke in the eye, at least) we know this about the typical American voter:
The majority of voters don't have the time, nor the inclination to delve deeply into any policy issues. They are far more interested in escaping from the harsh realities of this economic disaster by focusing on their favorite sports, the next episode of Mad Men, Heroes or Gossip Girl, and possibly a very tiny fraction of news sound bites - mainly those which announce the current stock market numbers.
I seriously think that what McCain needs to do is list, simply and very specifically, 3 to 5 bullet points outlining what the hell his team is planning on doing to improve the quality of people's lives, and then go quickly about the business of doing so once he's so privileged to be elected. I recommend McCain's talking points deal with these key areas:
I've been researching the Ayers/ACORN/Obama connection all weekend, and yes, there is a there there. Basically these people have started with a well-intended Robin Hood syndrome and inadvertently mutated it into an economic Ebola Virus. They should never be trusted with the economy again - that's the short version. The long, detailed and fact-filled version is going to become a thesis so I won't bore you with those details here. Stanley Kurtz is doing a great job with the facts on the Ayers/ACORN issue, and Fox's special report by David Asman which aired again this weekend handles the CRA/ACORN/Fannie/Freddie/subprime disaster extremely well for those who care to pay that much attention.
Get McCain back on track with specific solutions in time for the next debate, and he'll do very well. Get commitments from the key leaders listed above, who Americans know and trust, and he'll do really well. Avoid these topics at our own Epic Fail peril.
Lago, I luv ya
...you're a true romantic, and a dreamer ..
Damn, Lago!
I think that most people are ignorant and lazy, but you seem to think less highly of them than I do. It seems as though you think they're all retarded...
Sarah Palin on Energy? WTF?
Manhatten Project for Energy? We've got the technology necessary right now, unless you want some sort of zero point module in every home? Electrical locomotion is the way to go. Solar, Wind, Geo, Tidal, etc... It is simple, and cheaper all the way around. You don't need to have an A-Bomb type tech break-through to switch to it right now. You just need legislation (If you really want to accellerate the process)...
And Ayers... Don't get me started. Obama was a freakin' child when Ayers did what all he did. People change. Maybe Ayers reformed and all Obama did was work with him on some committee. Both candidates suck, but making something out of nothing is just a waste of time. Your time would be better spent on McCain and Keating 5 shenanigans, if you're into digging up dirt.
Heh...I love your SN
And you sound so refreshingly effervescent, which is meant as a compliment. I don't think people are retarded, I just think they're not paying attention. Case in point: let's say you were payinig attention to the list of former Democratic senators who were implicated in the Keating 5 but never prosecuted, such as former Senator John Glenn or former Senator Don Riegle, both of whom have endorsed Obama. If you were paying that particular level of attention, you might not want to continue shining light on the very repentant Senator John McCain in a very closed case. Nice try, though - thank you, drive through!
Here's where you are absolutely paying attention: without legislative changes, there is no way we can build 30-40 nuclear power plants, regardless of how safe the technology might be, because the permitting process alone will hold up these projects for 10 years in bureaucratic red tape. Great point.
"Manhattan Project" is merely a phrase, by the way, I'm not suggesting we sequester a group of rocket scientists at Los Alamos and have them develop atomic energy solutions, LoL. What I am suggesting is that we throw a great deal of investment in time, resources, knowledge, experience, imagination, vision and management into seeing exactly how we can bridge the gap (through drilling, clean coal and natural gas) toward your electrical utopia. And whatever happened to hydrogen, huh? Let's throw our shoulders into it and do it. That's what I'm sayin'. I think we agree much more than we disagree there.
And now on to Ayers. First I'm gonna get you started on Ayers' ideology. In his own words, he is a small "c" communist so let's begin there. Communism is a failed ideology. Since you may never have been taught this in women's and black studies class, perhaps you should Google it - oh wait that's right, Google is owned and operated by the New Left, which is a really sexy way of saying small 'c' communists. Redistribution of wealth doesn't work to even things out and make the world "fair". What it has done, with outstanding success, is make an overlord class of extremely wealthy (think: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo CEO's) and an underclass of very unwealthy (think: you, me, and my six-to-a-house college student neighbors). The middle class gets pretty much wiped out. What I forgot to mention in here is the crack-head and bandit class, kind of like the types we see in the old Akiro Kurasawa samurai movies - you know, the people without jobs who deal in nefarious deeds on the poor unsuspecting underclass villagers for which we have to call in the Seven Samurai for protection. We're talkin' feudal system, Baby. There is no utopia in communism, there's just a bunch of wealthy people and a bunch of poor people and a bunch of repression of free speech, choice, options, and all the things that allow you to express yourself freely right here on The Next Right. Capitalism ain't perfect, but it's not going to go medieval on your ass. Talk to the people in the former Soviet Union who are selling themselves into marriage with Amerikkkan bachelors while their relatives who stay behind in Russia drill holes into the gas lines so that they can heat their homes which subsequently explode. They'll tell you that the poorest people in this country are wealther than most of the people in their country. Go ahead on. Ask 'em.
And now we come to the part where I'm going to get you started on Ayers' violent behavior, and here's why. It doesn't matter how old Barack Obama was when Ayers committed his crimes - that's like saying I was only 16 when Charlie Manson murdered my neighbors the Tates and La Bianca's in L.A., but God Love Him, he's my buddy now and we do great, great work together for the common good of The People's Republic of California. Working with an unrepentant murderer to benefit society would be a perfect example what Soren Kirkegaard meant in the mid-1800's when he accused Georg W. Hegel of developing a philosophy in which the ends justify the means. Hegel is usually credited as having spawned both Marxism and Fascism - which intersect nicely in today's modern 21st century "New Left". Since the New Left doesn't seem to understand the concept of irony, let me help. Malcolm Little, aka Malcolm X, aka Malik Shabazz, gave several very famous speeches in which he advocated black nationalism and overthrowing white oppression "by any means necessary" including violence, murder, and total badness. Even though Malcolm/Malik realized after his pilgrimage to Mecca that such ideas were hellishly dangerous horse-crap, successors of his in the Black Panthers, Students for a Democratic Society and their splinter group The Weathermen run by Ayers, decided to cherry-pick his earlier philosophy and use it against what they called the dumb-ass Bourgeois enemy pigs. This is a good example of how "words matter". Malcolm would never have approved of his words being taken to this level of seriosity but he never got to really disapprove of it much since he was assassinated in 1965 by the thugs of Louis Farrakhan's, another dear friend and partner of Ayers.
Thanks to the research of Dr. Stanley Kurtz, Senior Fellow at the Ethics and Policy Center, who patiently sorted through the CAC stacks at the Daley Library after weeks of roadblocks put in his way even though the information was supposed to be available to the public, we now know that the Chicago Annenberg Challenge ran through $160 million dollars –$50 million from the Annenberg Foundation, managed by Brown University — and a reported $110 million dollars in matching funds. CAC, run by ex-officio chief Ayers, disbursed money through Barack Obama to various far-left community organizers, such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN).
The CAC’s agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers’s educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism. In the mid-1960s, Mr. Ayers taught at a radical alternative school, and served as a community organizer in Cleveland’s ghetto. In works like “City Kids, City Teachers” and “Teaching the Personal and the Political,” Mr. Ayers wrote that teachers should be community organizers dedicated to provoking resistance to American racism and oppression. His preferred alternative? “I’m a radical, Leftist, small ‘c’ communist,” Mr. Ayers said in an interview in Ron Chepesiuk’s, “Sixties Radicals,” at about the same time Mr. Ayers was forming CAC.
So if you want to play idealism politics, you'd better decide which kind of idealism you're really buying into - the kind that actually does improve people's lives in a positive, productive way that builds people up and creates success for them when they work hard and take personal responsibility, or the kind that's steeped in dependence on the government, economic failure, violence, murder, and uses "any means necessary" to achieve its bloody and ultimately totalitarian ends. This is the American Revolution vs. the French Revolution, Baby, and France was a helluva place to live after that little bit of business concluded. Get schooled a little more, and then come back and we'll chat again. I still love your S/N. ;-)
Working smarter
There are things that anyone can do, regardless of what the McCain campaign does and despite how badly they do things.
For instance, BHO wouldn't be where he is now without the help of the MSM. Therefore, if something can be done about them, that will have an impact on BHO now or later.
What anyone can do is help discredit them.
For an example, when one of the WaPo's hacks posted to one of their blogs, I posted a link to past examples of her pro-BHO bias. Do a find for 24ahead.com here:
voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/07/obama_team_ready_for_mud.html
Unfortunately, my occasional attempts to get others to do the same haven't exactly worked that well:
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2090461/posts
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2103380/posts
Another thing that anyone can do is to go to a BHO appearance and ask him real questions to his face. Get his response on video and upload it to Youtube. I've been pushing that plan for almost two years without luck. A good question - defined at that link - would get hundreds of thousands or millions of views and would show he isn't qualified.
If this site doesn't want BHO to win, it should consider pushing either of those plans, both of which can be done no matter what McCain does.
Today we heal
Harvard schmarvard - if we had the time and luxury of waiting around while the think tank robots plan out the theoretically best way to create sustainable energy, the Obama paper (it aint no plan) would be the ticket.
But we DON'T have the time for this. Today, we need to keep our jobs, pay our bills, save some money for our golden years, and put some much needed money back into our failing econcomy - which can only happen if we fix the problem immediately.
Today should be about getting us all back on the horse.
Today should be about finding some short term ways of producing more energy independent means, including using our own resources to become more independent of foreign interest.
Today should be about looking for ways to ease into total energy independent, including renewable sources.
Tomorrow would be about enacting these future plans, without sacrificing our livelihoods today to accomodate those lofty goals.
Short Term Thinking Has REALLY Paid Off, Hasn't It!
Guess what? Short Term thinking is what got us here (In this financial crisis). I got news for you, there ain't no easy way out of it. It is going to be painful for us all. Embrace it and learn from it.
Our economy is failing because it has had a laser like focus on the short term. It is set up to reward unsustainable growth or gains. This has been going on strong for more than two decades. We have dug a mighty big hole, is what I'm saying.
Easing us into energy independence will not be 'easy' or 'painless'. Our Petro-chemical addiction is the foundation of the US economy. It will take legislation and decades to wean ourselves off it if we try to go the 'easy' way. It is better to make aggressive changes and reduce the overall pain of the transition. I'm not saying 'Cold-Turkey', but I am saying 5 years of 'Rehab' for us all. Rehab, in this case, means aggressive repowering of America.
Everyone's search for the 'easy' path out of this mess is a collosal waste of time - I.e. they are in denial...
Taxman In The Casino: The Truth About Taxes And Our Economy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66z5TDrwPxM
Good article for writing
Good article for writing Economics papers on political science topics.