| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Strangle the Democrats with Fannie, Freddie, and the Housing crisis
The meltdown of Fannie and Freddie should be a transformative moment in American politics. It should discredit the whole Democratic economic agenda. It is too bad that it happened in the middle of the most interesting Presidential election in a generation because there are lessons to learn from it. Several points.
Let's start with some numbers. Contributions since 1989(!) to ALL members of Congress. Note that this is an aggregate over time. Note how a guy who has been in Congress for 3 years manages to come in 3rd on the list.
|
Name |
Office |
Party/State |
Total |
|
1. Dodd, Christopher J |
S |
D-CT |
$133,900 |
|
2. Kerry, John |
S |
D-MA |
$111,000 |
|
3. Obama, Barack |
S |
D-IL |
$105,849 |
| 4. Clinton, Hillary |
S |
D-NY |
$75,550 |
|
5. Kanjorski, Paul E |
H |
D-PA |
$65,500 |
First, this is a Democratic scandal. In yesterday's WaPo Al Hubbard and Noam Neusner ask "Where was Senator Dodd?" The answer is clear. On the take. Open Secrets notes who gets money from these guys:
Fifteen of the 25 lawmakers who have received the most from the two companies combined since the 1990 election sit on either the House Financial Services Committee; the Senate Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Committee; or the Senate Finance Committee. The others have seats on the powerful Appropriations or Ways & Means committees, are members of the congressional leadership or have run for president. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), chairman of the Senate banking committee, has received the most from Fannie and Freddie's PACs and employees ($133,900 since 1989). Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) has received $65,500. Kanjorski chairs the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs.
But they miss the important point. The GSEs give to Democrats primarily.
And this is the second point. These are partisan instituttions. Republicans tried to reform it, but got out lobbied every time. Hubbard and Neusner described how this works:
The administration did not accept half-measures. In 2005, Republican Mike Oxley, then chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, brought up a reform bill (H.R. 1461), and Fannie and Freddie's lobbyists set out to weaken it. The bill was rendered so toothless that Card called Oxley the night before markup and promised to oppose it. Oxley pulled the bill instead.
When there was a Republican Congress, Congressional leadership tried to do the right thing, but Fannie and Freddie's lobbyists picked off some weak Republicans. With a Democratic Congress, Fannie and Freddie just feed at the trough.
Third, these guys are some of the most powerful figures in the Democratic lobbyist-operative firmament. Obama was forced to fire James Johnson, his first VP Vetter. Johnson had been CEO of Fannie Mae. But it doesn't stop there. Johnson, while a consultant for Fannie and Countrywide, was passing out below market loans to Senator Dodd, among others.
The recent CEO of Fannie was Franklin Delano Raines. (what do you bet his parents politics were?) Raines was a Clinton OMB Director and worked in the Carter White House. Raines was replaced with an actual business guy.
Fourth, it doesn't stop there. Not only that, but the affordable housing racket is also used as a way to launder government money into corrupt Democratic voter registration practices. One of the organizations pushing subprime loans and other "affordable housing" financial vehicles... ACORN, which got a sweet deal in the Housing Bill.
What is the upshot of all of this? The housing meltdown has both causes and effects that are ideologically aligned with Democratic objectives. While gutting the regulatory apparatus for a huge segment of our economy, leading Democrats were receiving contributions and below market loans from the very people whose regulations their were gutting. It was used to move money into Democratic grassroots campaign vehicles. And it moved substantial parts of the economy into government control. According to financial analyst Barry Richoltz, "socialism for the rich."
This should be a long-term stain on the credibility of Democratic Party's economic management. Too bad no one has the attention span to notice.
- Soren Dayton's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
I know where Senator Dodd was most of the last year
He moved to Iowa so as to run for President
http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/10/20/news/iowa/55d960605de43bd68625737a000e9a3b.txt
Now, he spends lots of time at his vacation home in Connemara, Ireland
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-rennie0817.artaug17,0,6806840.column
Dealing with the problems his senate committee is supposed to address,is just not a priority for the Senator, despite his lofty pronouncements.
.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/15/AR2007021501555_2.html
http://rightblog.zubrcom.net/category/blog-tags/chris-dodd
McCain accepted $170K
strangle this...
http://www.propublica.org/article/fannie-freddie-gave-big-support-to-oba...
Rope cheerfully provided
McCain was on the case years ago, while Dodd and the Democrats insisted Fannie and Freddie were just peachy keen. http://journalinquirer.com/articles/2008/07/16/connecticut/doc487b4ff58727c620830661.txt
http://www.johnmccain.com/informing/news/OpEds/91a77859-eaa7-446c-ab4c-5568c7b52741.htm
Strangle?
How the fuck is Soren Dayton in a position to talk about strangling anybody?
I like this idea
We could even synthesize it into a catchy slogan: "John McCain puts Country First. Democrats in Washington put Countrywide first."
Doesn't it bother anyone...
...that McCain's hands are just as dirty in this Fannie and Freddie debacle as Obama's, and by extension, so is Sarah Palin's?
ex animo
davidfarrar
I award you no points
I have to hear how you justify that.
It's not hard, if you are a reformer.
First of all, if you are a straight-shooting maverick reformer, as Gov. Sarah Palin says she is, wouldn't you want to see her at least publically slap John's wrists for accepting campaign contributions from the likes of Boisi and Hohlt? Once you know the score, you would either have to insist on this kind of open transparency or become part of the cover up. It is an interesting dilemma; don't you think?
Which course do you think Sarah Palin is going to follow?
Now you may be right. I may have jumped the gun. But I don't really expect Sarah Palin to insist that John McCain do the right thing (If McCain was smart, he would) and return any and all campaign contributions "bundled" by -- Freddie Mac's board member Geoffrey T. Boisi and Fannie Mae lobbyist Richard F. Hohlt -- who've raised between $100,000-$250,000 for McCain, plus any and all campaign contributions from Homeownership Alliance..."a coalition of banks and housing industry interests led by Fannie and Freddie to stave off regulations."
For the record, I hope I am worng. I hope she grabs John McCain by the earlobe and walks him over to the bank and forces him to send that money back from whence it came.
In any case, this would be an interesting "test-case" to see if Sarah Palin is really different or just the same old, same old.
ex animo
davidfarrar
And if it turns out. . .
. . .that ol' Dave here is correct in his suspicions -- or even if it doesn't -- we'd like for you to keep us in mind:
Yes, Walt....
...every one's voice will be heard, their votes accurately counted and verified at The National Online Party.
Yes, even Bubba's.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Really?
All 12 of them?
Yes, Ben...
The issue of total transparency is actually the highest hurdle we have to meet before we actually accept members. We are all totally dedicated to archiving this goal with our effort,
even when it comes to the party's Treasurer's Reports -- all must be published on the web, with total access to all registered members.
We also have a group coding out Robert's Rules of Parliamentary Procedure for the internet, which is, of course, a private commercial venture. For its contribution, the National Online Party will have access to such webware at a substantially lower price than the general public when the task is completed.
As an example: The whole idea of a quorum will be substantially different in an online deliberative group meeting as opposed to a regular brick and mortar deliberative meeting; What is a majority? How long are the meetings? things of this nature would be all different when a deliberative group meeting is being held online.
But Ben, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interests in our efforts. It is my hope that through the use of public criticism, we can recognize where our structure may need to be changed. So in a way, you, Walt and others are helping the process forward, and for that I give you our heartiest thanks.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Anything for the cause, Dave. . .
. . .anything for the cause.
He "justifies" it because he can't stand the McCain/Palin ticket
IMHO.
One thing I find interesting about the accounting of donations in the NYT graphic is how it lists "29 Lobbyists and Others" and a large sum of $63,500 for McCain. Who are all the "others"? Could these "unnamed others" be thousands of smaller McCain donors who happen to be employeed by Fannie and Freddie? Just askin'. This strikes me as a similar situation to the camera angles with Charlie Gibson's interview - framed to provide a certain advantage, if you will, to the "host".
Oh that's right, Americans are too stupid to figure this stuff out. Damn, I forgot!
Come to think about it...
...it would be good politics to establish and display this kind of dynamic relationship between John McCain and Sarah Palin just prior to the election. You know, the good cop/bad cop scenario. It would appeal to all three of McCain's constituencies, his base, Independents and moderates.
I apologize for the sexual innuendo of this gif. It was the closest one I could find to illustrate my point.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Go ahead.
1. Fannie and Freddie were PUBLIC corporations. Not government agencies. The 24-MILLION dollar parachute of their CEO is a disgrace and a reminder of what Conservatives on Wall Street stand for.
2. Phil Gramm, McCain's most senior Economiic adviser, is hip-deep in this
3. In 26 years in Congress, McCain did nothing about this.
4. Last time there was a Government bailout of financial orgs, McCain had to apologize for years in the Keating scandal. He is now associated with corruption forever.
5. Henry Paulson and the Bush White House and the GOP Congresses are the ones associated with the Housing debacle. Bush and the New Media spent years touting how Bush was the Housing President, how Bush made homeowning a priority, how Bush put more minorities in their own homes than any President before him. Now Republicans will get the blame, too.
6. It is also a profoundly damaging blow to the Conservative ideal of trashing Government regulation and control of marketplaces. Running to Uncle Sam for a bailout is what Welfare Queens, not Conservatives do.
So, yeah. You guys can bring out the nooses, and we'll fight you to see who gets lynched and strangled.
Well okay then,
I guess the fact that it was Democrats who supported the creation of these entities as part of their public-private partnership "good government" fantasies, the fact that it was Democrats who for years opposed any real oversight or reform of these failing agencies or the fact that Dodd in company are the ones who profitted of these at the expense of the taxpayers is simply some Republican "dirty trick" then?
And the Keating 5 scandal? You mean that Democrat scandal that only tangetially involved McCain who the media drag out in order to try paint it as a "bipartisan" scandal?
By the way with a name like Jim Dandy to the Rescue, do you do minstrel shows?
Jim Dandy probably a reference to Black Oak Arkansas
My guess is that "Jim Dandy to the Rescue" is a reference to the hippie Southern rock band called Black Oak Arkansas whose lead singer was "Jim Dandy" Mangum. They had a hit song, I believe it was on an album called Hot 'n Nasty, called Jim Dandy to the Rescue. LoL - watching this video reminds me of why I became a punk in the late 70's. I really can't stand hippies, but that's another story.
Minstrel shows are a little before my time, so I could be wrong - but I doubt it.
Anyway, on the subject of McCain and Freddie/Fannie, I noticed that the Wall Street Journal Edition Report panel called out both McCain and Obama last night for taking campaign financing from these giants. They equally called out Henry Paulson for "nationalizing" this group of jerks rather than going into receivership. I take back my previous comment defending McCain on this one. I can't find a good defense here at all. What's next? Nationalizing the auto industry and Lehman Brothers? WTF happened to good old Capitalism including risk as well as profit AND loss? The total lack of personal responsibility here has become completely appalling to me. McCain owes us big time when it comes to righting these free market failures.
McCain defended and wins election with just on press release
With just one press release issued from McCain's Campaign Headquarters stating that Sarah Palin has asked him to give back the campaign contributions from all parties involved in the Fannie/Freddie debacle, and he has agreed to do so -- McCain can win the election.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Thanks for the info
My only knowlege of the term Jim Dandy is the idea that he is a black man from the south who in the late 19th and early 20th centuries headed North and tried to fit with more sophisticated urban culture but clearly could not hide his background. This became the impetus for the black-faced minstrel shows in the first place. Thus it played to both racial stereotypes as well as those about "hicks" from the South.
It is isn't often I agree with the Washington Post
or praise members of the Clinton administration, but it's readily apparent from this article that the inpetus for this disaster came from those senior members of the Congressional leadership who chose to shield Fannie and Freddie from the consequences of their actions.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26695074/
In case one has been hanging with Amelia Earhart or Jimmy Hoffa, John McCain is probably the most disliked man on Capitol Hill by the so-called "leadership" of both parties. And on my most critical day I think that's a huge plus.
Thank you for underlining Barney Frank's involvement in this
Frank is a perfect example of people with good intentions for "the common good" propagating "unexpected results". The story goes that home ownership is best for people in this country - by any means necessary. Frank's got The People's best interests in mind. Too bad he suffers from a lack of imagination. Does that make him an idiot? Maybe not. Does that make him evil? Maybe not. Does that make him dangerous? Definitely.
At least Frank was at his job during the last session
while Chris Dodd neglected his duties. Although paying attention to problems you'd rather not fix isn't a great endorsement'
Big Ben Is Right Twice a Day
Because his clock has stopped.
Jim Dandy to the Rescue has nothing to do with Minstrel Shows, but it does show Ben's propensity for trying to paint a "blackface" on his problems..
HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!
Here's where my moniker comes from, an old right-wing blog post that tickled my ivories:
Jim Dandy-Lavern Baker
Posted by michiganredneck on May 20, 2008
I am a bit late on the Rockabilly and technically “Jim Dandy” is not Rockabilly, but same era and old school blues rocks just as well. This country and the Republican Party truly needs “Jim Dandy to the rescue.” We don’t need someone to rescue us to give us handouts from the gubmint. We need someone to rescue us from the handouts the gubmint gives to others, via our hard earned money that gets taken in the form of taxes. We need someone to rescue us from this immigration mess. The Republican Party has lost its way and needs someone to rescue it from the point John McCain and the other RINOs are taking it. I am not even sure what it means to be Republican. I don’t even think those in the party know what it means to be a Republican..."
http://michiganredneck.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/jim-dandy-lavern-baker/
Democrats in the 80's?? That was GENERATIONS ago. The GOP is the party in power, the party in the White House. It as not yet sunk in to Americans that the GOP got kicked out of the Congress 2 years ago.
America right now is telling anyone who will listen that it is completely disgusted with Republican-Conservative ideas.
One of the first rules I learned on Wall Street which helped me become a young millionaire many years ago is "The Market is Always Right". And you argue it's wrong or dismiss its conclusions at your peril.
This thread is about the wisdom of launching a Bush-Doctrine preemptive strike attack on Democrats off this flimsy platform. My answer is sure, go ahead.
Great recording!
Much better than the hippies. I really cannot stand hippies.
I agree that the market is always right, but in the market, sometimes we win and sometimes we lose and if we lose, then we have to take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. Failure teaches us how to be more successful next time. There's risk involved, and that requires a competent crew at the helm. These government bailout safety nets allow incompetent managers and leaders to keep doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results. That's the definition of insanity.
I don't think that Barr and Paul can possibly help this situation unless they work from within the Republican Party. We cannot just throw the baby out with the bathwater, we have to change the dirty water and help the conservative baby regain its health. Real change comes from within. Real revolution starts from the inside.
Palin isn't just a governor, she's a concept. Obama represents egalitarian collectivism, protectionism, socialism and large government whereas Palin represents rugged individiualism, independence, free markets, free trade and small government. She's the anti-Obama. She does represent the public's desire for major change, and this still is a center/right country. I really wish that Libertarians of good principle, good ideas, good experience and good will would help this country by working with us instead of against us. We need you, and I daresay you might just need us as well.
What my clock is stopped?
Your the asshole who thinks this is the Republicans fault when it clearly invovles Democrat malfeasance. Give me break your typical leftist who thinks who hi so smart even when he clearly comes to the wrong conclusion.
But thianks for your explanation about your handle comes from even if I think it sucks.
I could be mistaken about Jim Dandy to the Rescue, but
I think Jim Dandy's positions reflect a Libertarian point of view rather than Obama Leftism per se. I don't think the confrontational tone helps, but obviously feelings are running high at the moment. I think it's possible that we are more allies than adversaries, however. Again, I may be wrong. I'm just guessin'.
Just for the record, Ben, you and I are Republican allies but even our cohorts Dan Henninger and John Fund at the WSJ feel that Republicans had a part in the malfeasance due to the campaign contributions. I don't know if I've ever agreed with David Farrar about anything before today, but in this case I have to admit that if McCain returned the funds, that would go a long way toward supporting his ethical reform position. Farrar, you are right on this time. But the real question is, Farrar, if he does this will YOU vote for him?
As I said to Jim Dandy, Republicans need all the allies we can get from all corners of the political spectrum. I hope that when it comes time to pull the lever, you will all be with us.
Come on, sis...
...all I said was if he was smart enough to play the Sarah Palin card correctly in this Fannie/Freddie matter, he could put the issue to rest and win the presidency...and now you are telling me you want more?
That being said; don't you owe me an apology?
ex animo
davidfarrar
Oh fine then
If you're going to play the Mr. Bean card, I guess I owe you an apology. 'Scuze me. I sorry.
Now I can haz cheezburger and your vote for McCain/Palin?
Wait a minute. Not so fast
First of all..I accept your apologies.
Secondly, McCain hasn't offered to return the money yet. But most importantly, he hasn't demonstrated to me that he is capable of thinking about anything other than himself first, if you get my drift.
I would also add at this time, the "bundled "$115,800 McCain received from employees of Lehman Brothers, as well, that Sarah Palin has either asked or should have asked him to return.
ex animo
davidfarrar
From your post to Rick Davis, Steve Schmidt and Tucker Bounds
Hope so. And since I do believe that several McCain staffers actually read the blogs on this site, your input may be duly noted.
Publicly announcing the return of those contributions would certainly be a great way to stay on message, and attributing it to Sarah Palin would certainly leave an indelible imprint of her ability to influence and energize McCain's core values. The more I view this from a strategic as well as a tactical perspective, the more I like it. Let's hope the right people are paying attention in more ways than one.
Mr. Dayton please go on!!!!