Talking Like a Conservative

Republicans, even those opposed to Obama's stimulus deficit spending plan, have seemed to have problems using conservative rhetoric to combat a bill which is such an obvious antithesis to conservative principles.

A recent example comes from the Weekly Standard (emphasis added):

Republicans also have to overcome some of their aversion to government spending. The flaw in the House stimulus bill is not that it spends money. It's that it spends money too slowly, and what money the bill does spend hardly goes to durable public goods. Thus the GOP's job: Shift the direct spending from useless liberal appropriations to constructive and long-lasting conservative projects.

Here's a much better way for conservatives to challenge what SC Governor Mark Sanford calls  a "savior-based economy:"

“A problem that was created by building up of too much debt will not be solved with yet more debt,” Gov. Mark Sanford said Sunday, making a reference to the federal deficit spending that will likely finance the federal stimulus package. [snip]

 “That is quite different than a market-based economy where some rise and some fall but there’s a consequence to making a stupid decision,” Sanford said after pointing to the powers granted to the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve to help deal with the current economic crisis.

“A lot of people who’ve made some very stupid decisions are being bailed out by the population at large,” he added.

Instead of bailing out failing companies, Sanford told CNN’s John King that the government should let the economy work through the current challenges without intervention.

With a Senate vote on a bloated Democratic spending bill expected this evening, it's not too late to send your last protest message to DC right now.

UPDATE: My good friend Shana helps make my case:

As one of the newest members of the Alabama Republican State Executive Committee, I had the opportunity to attend a party dinner in Montgomery and the privilege to meet the key-note speaker, Governor Sanford. 

There have been assertions from Democrats and Republicans alike that Rush Limbaugh is the current voice of the GOP, but I expressed to Governor Sanford that I disagree.  It is my hope that true, small-government fiscal conservatives such as Mark Sanford will be the prevailing voice now and in the years to come.

UPDATE II: Robert Higgs provides some excellent speaking points at the Christian Science Monitor.  Here's his conclusion:

The US government has shown repeatedly that as an economic manager it is not to be trusted. What we need most are authorities wise enough to follow the dictum, "First, do no harm." The stimulus package will do enormous harm. The huge debt burden it entails, by itself, ought to condemn the measure. America is already drowning in debt. But the measure will also wreak harm in countless other directions by effectively reallocating resources on a grand scale according to political priorities, rather than according to individual preferences and economic rationality. As our history shows, the economy can recover strongly on its own, if only the politicians will stay out of the way.

 

3.666665
Your rating: None Average: 3.7 (3 votes)

Comments

Boom! how do you deal with a debt

that is greater than THE ENTIRE WORLD'S GDP??????

Bam! it's all gone. Where is the money set to? Do contracts still exist?

the world waits your answer with snores.

Gov. Sanford is addressing TARP not stimulus

It would appear that Governor Sanford is addressing the TARP program Wall Street bailouts and the Weekly Standard is addressing the stimulus package.

Job one: figure out who's talking about what.

Sanford covered both Tarp and stimulus

"...making a reference to the federal deficit spending that will likely finance the federal stimulus package."

My key problem with Matthew Continetti is that he's at war with deficit hawks.

Another day, another trillion

 

"Republicans, even those opposed to Obama's stimulus deficit spending plan, have seemed to have problems using conservative rhetoric to combat a bill which is such an obvious antithesis to conservative principles."

 

That's because the rhetoric has run dry. Instead of deficit spending, they  have been deficit taxing. The stimulus is 1 trill, but the war in Iraq is est. 10 trillion.

Who's sticking us down the hole faster, it's sadly debatable in no clear way. I feel quesy about the stimulus, but why bitch about Dems when Reps aren't any better.

 

 

Backwards

Actually, this "stimulus" bill will cost more that the combined cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (which were also spread out over several years).

but it's only twice King Henry's paycheck!

you have ZERO credibility until you start kvetching about the treasury.

where are your numbers?

Conservative est for Iraq alone are 3 trillion. That's assuming we leave that place soon.

And actually, that is part of my reasoning for being squeemish about the current stimulus. Our two wars have been a stimulus of sorts.  And financially, where has that gotten us? However, ultimately I don't side with Dems but against Reps who basically have dug a hole. It's the hole diggers bitching that someone else is now digging a hole.

It's kind of sick, but at this point I'm curious as to who will dig better. What's good for the goose is good for the gander . . . . and all a big mess.

Where's the pary for fiscal responsibility . . . I want to sign up!

OK, how about this

OK, how about this one:

"That's the kind of thing that happens when people lose control of their government to an inbred, self-serving, self-perpetuating political class."

Oops - that won't work either, because that political class has "R" after its name just as much as it has "D."

 This spending bill is purely an example of the political class taking care of their own, and being good handmaidens to their masters in the government class - the permanent welfare/regulatory state bureaucracy and their unions.

They made it true

The US government has shown repeatedly that as an economic manager it is not to be trusted.

Republicans in Congress and the White House have worked for decades to make this true.  They packed the government with incompetent partisans.  They racked up huge unnecessary deficits.  They neglected regulation and enforcement.  No wonder their alternative ecoomic theories (cut taxes to grow the economy) have so little influence now.

 

Oh, really?

And, I suppose, it's also the GOP's fault that Joseph Stalin didn't do a very good job managing his economy either.

Don, that's a strawman.

Can you find something that isn't?

If you think about it . .

Stalin wasn't exactly a liberal  : )