| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
The Libertarian Vote in 2008
[I've invited Stephen Gordon, an Internet Consultant with the Libertarian Party Presidential candidate Bob Barr, to post some thoughts on the libertarian movement and the Bob Barr campaign. As Gordon notes, libertarians are a very influential swing constituency, and I believe they should be an important part of the Right's coalition. But their alliance has to be earned. - Jon Henke]
For those of you who don't know me, I'm one of those old-school small-government types who would have voted for Goldwater if I had been born a generation earlier. I cast my first presidential vote for Reagan in 1980, worked Republican campaigns through the nineties, but became disillusioned with the GOP because of their failure to reduce the size, scope and intrusiveness of government at virtually all levels. I became disenfranchised from the Republican Party when even the rhetoric became hard to distinguish from that coming from Democrats. As an Alabamian, I eventually disregarded the GOP as a vehicle for limited government when our Republican governor attempted to enact the largest tax increase in state history. Since then, I still work an occasional Republican campaign (ranging from city council races to presidentials), but primarily work within the libertarian movement and Libertarian Party.
Jon Henke asked if I'd contribute some material relating to "the Right, strategy, coalition, the campaign" of the Barr campaign and the libertarian movement. Perhaps the best starting point is to better define the libertarian movement and the Barr campaign.
Fortunately, the campaign just released a YouTube which does precisely this.
"On a personal note I also want to share that Bob's campaign for the Presidency isn't just about the here and now," Barr's wife Jeri wrote in the campaign e-mail which accompanied the video. "Our four children and six grandchildren are important to us and he's working so hard to leave them an America that is better than the one we inherited."
"Libertarians are increasingly a swing vote, and they are a larger share of the electorate than the fabled 'soccer moms' and 'NASCAR dads,'" states this 2006 Cato study, which indicates that thirteen percent (Gallup consistently assigns twenty percent to this demographic while Pew prefers nine percent) of Americans are libertarian.
So what exactly do libertarians believe? Much the same as many members of the self-described right, as this video demonstrates:
Quite a few people have argued (and predicted) that the limited-government "Leave Us Alone Coalition" was responsible for turning the Congress blue in 2006. Ignoring this bloc in 2008 is certain to ensure continued Democratic advances. Our nation has been creeping towards statism for decades, but that crawling pace has now advanced into a full-fledged jog. If we don't have the courage to face this obvious fact, sooner rather than later, we are soon to become spectators of a political sprint towards the finish line of totalitarian socialism.


Comments
Goldwater Republican Here
I consider myself to be more from the Goldwater-wing of the party, and would prefer the Republican party move into a more libertarian direction. That being said, I have a very low opinion of the Libertarian Party itself, and have always considered it to be something of a joke. A person is not going to agree with any political party all of the time. Even though I consider myself a libertarian-leaning individual, the Libertarian party, for example, supports open borders. The Republican Party shares about 80% of my views, so as a pragmatist I support them because they have the best chance to actually win and change policy.
If anything, McCain has a more "libertarian" record than the current Libertarian Presidential nominee, Bob Barr, who supported one of the largest new government entitlements in several generations, the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill. McCain voted against it.
I think Ron Paul had the right idea, you try to transform the Republican Party within, rather than try to splinter it off. (even if some of his supporters were a little nutty) I feel libertarian's main goal should be a change in public policy and educating the masses on a government philosophy, not building up a political party that's going nowhere.
The Republican Party is the home for supporters of small government, and you have already seen backlash from the grassroots on their spendthrift ways. In contrast, he Democrats share nothing meaningful of the libertarian philosophy. I would encourage libertarians to try an nominate good, small-government Republicans. I think the common goals we all share would have a much better chance of actually being enacted into policy.
Perhaps I'd give the party
Perhaps I'd give the party more credence -- not that I don't respect it -- if it had a different nominee. Bob Barr talks a tough game, but was only talk when it came for action. He opposes the Patriot Act, but voted for it. He opposes the war in Iraq, but voted for it. He opposes expanded government spending, but voted for Medicare Part D expansion.
If the Republicans had acted like true economic conservatives...
... there wouldn't be a need or room for a strong Libertarian 3rd party. Unfortunately, the RNC and Republicans in Congress have lost their way.
byron1776.blogspot.com