On Facial-Recognition Tech in 30 States, CSDL and INTERPOL

It's a blip on the radar, but we'd better get used to it. For now, 30 states say they're using it via DMVs to track identity theives:

New York this year became one of more than 30 states to deploy the controversial technology at its Department of Motor Vehicles. Gov. David A. Paterson will brief reporters Tuesday on hundreds of cases the state is prosecuting as a result — including at least one that officials will tout as a major criminal apprehension.

New York officials would not comment prior to the briefing, but the Empire State is just the latest in a long line to find that facial recognition can be a powerful tool to unmask identity thieves and other imposters.

...

Facial-recognition software automatically examines digital photographs, comparing the unique underlying structures of the face across different images — flagging suspicious matches.

..

Brian Zimmer of the Coalition for a Secure Driver's License told The Times that what distinguishes New York, Indiana and a dozen or so states that he said take a similar "hard line on imposters" is that "every attempt at fraud is prosecuted," and that officials press felony charges. The coalition is a nonprofit that advocates the introduction of anti-fraud measures in motor vehicle departments nationwide.

Mr. Zimmer said New York had carefully piloted facial-recognition technology for more than a year before rolling it out in January "to ensure full scale application throughout the state would be successful, and not lead to mistakes or service delays. I understand that hundreds of people have been arrested so far this year as a result of its deployment."

And blah, blah.

Pay attention: always perk your ears when you hear about a "non-profit" working to promote a government agency.

Non-profits are like lobbyists. Only, they usually specialize in lobbying the public to accept whatever (usually progressive) policy is being implemented by the state.

They're on the state's payroll. The government dime. The taxpayer's dole. That should tell you who they "work for."

So .. when anyone tells you the bureaucracy of the state is growing larger and larger, think about including non-profits. They compete for government funds, so of course they'll mold themselves to pushing, advocating, cultivating and activating the state message.

Now, getting back to Zimmer.

Zimmer's organization, the Coalition for a Secure Driver’s License, basically sets about promoting the implementation, compliance and enforcement of the Real ID Act, which sets minimum standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and ID cards. The law is based off of the 9/11 Commission report and, of course, there are privacy concerns. At one point, Napolitano wanted to have it repealed.

A quick google shows that back in 2007, Zimmer was a lead lobbyist for Kelly, Anderson and AssociatesHe testified in front of the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security in May, 2007 as part of the "Interrupting Terrorist Travel:  Strengthening the Security of International Travel Documents" testimony.

Ronald K. Nobel, the then-and-now Secretary-General of INTERPOL was on the same panel with him.

At the end of April 2010, as part of the Coalition for Secure Drivers Licenses, he was part of a Secure Documents forum, where he was session chair for "Developments in Technology and Applications for Identification cards, Driver's Licenses and Smart Cards"

Included in that session was Virginia's "new state Identity Document (ID)" where "driver's license meet the federal standards, and go beyond."

INTERPOL was part of that forum, too .. but, you know, they talk passports, counterfeit money and currency.Here in the states, you won't hear how INTERPOL wanted a worldwide facial recognition database to nap suspects in '08.

So, you can imagine about that "beyond" standard Virginia licenses are establishing.

Once something goes national, it's a matter of time before it's tapped into what's occurring worldwide.

Over across the pond, they use facial recognition tech at airports and are proposing other uses through the compilation of giant databases.

How we'll be using this technology does not remain to be seen.

It's here, now.

Zimmer's group called itself a "public educational charity."

I didn't know about this, did you?

0
Your rating: None

Comments

Agreed on the main point, think you should qualify subpoint

Veronica, I'm completely aligned with your concerns about facial recognition.  It's absolutely chilling.

I hope, however, you can dial back your language about non-profits, because you've cast too broad a blanket. 

Case in point, I worked for several of non-profits over time that were entirely reliant on government funding, yet we weren't part of an progressive cabal or any such thing like you suggest when you say "specialize in lobbying the public to accept whatever (usually progressive) policy is being implemented by the state"  (I see you qualified it with a "usually" but that's not qualification enough).  We provided vocational and residential services to adults who are developmentally disabled (specifically, mental retardation).  There's an entire array of non-profit organizations that fit this mold and have nothing whatsoever to do with any progressive or conservative action. 

Given that, I hope you'll be willing to modify your post in order not to negatively implicate the perfectly decent and necessary work being carried about by thousands of non-profit agencies and the millions of workers employed by such agencies.

Again, I'm entirely in agreement with the point you're making about facial recognition software and the great threat to individual rights that it poses.