| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
A Conservative Case for Healthcare to be Made Wednesday
This week, Senator Jim DeMint will give his reply to Obamacare and it is sure to be a conservative reply as he is being backed by several stalwartly conservative organizations in the effort.
Groups like Americans for Tax Reform, Media Research Center, Americans for Prosperity, Conservatives for Patients’ Rights and Tea Party Patriots will all stand behind Senator DeMint's presentation in the Cannon Building in the House Budget Committee Hearing room on the Hill this Wednesday at noon.
DeMint has a full menu of items to propose and we have been informed that the list of issues that will be discussed will include:
- Do no harm, keep employer-based plans
- Vouchers of $2,000 for individuals and $5,000 for a family will be proposed for those without insurance whether it be private or employer-based
- It will be proposed that health savings accounts should be able to be used for insurance premiums -- this is thought a great benefit for employers that want to drop their own plans
- A national market for health insurance will be proposed so that competition across state lines will improve choice for everyone
- Block grants to help states with their programs will be discussed, this will prevent guaranteed issued coverage and will also help federal mandates harder to impose
- Tort reform to reduce predatory and frivolous lawsuits is being considered, as will caps on awards. This will be closely related to Senator Ensign's malpractice law proposal
- Also, an option for individuals to leave their employer-based insurance plan and to choose a tax credit to pursue their own insurance will also be on the table
DeMint claims that these ideas will help 22.4 million currently uninsured Americans get healthcare coverage at lower costs. It will be cheaper and faster than the Kennedy plan currently finding such a tough road of it in the Senate. DeMint says this plan will save $310 billion over 5 years with the tax credit voucher proposal.
It will certainly be interesting to see where this proposal goes and if the media will give DeMint the attention he deserves.
- Warner Todd Huston's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Comments
Events Marketing
Great tips. I am new to business, trying to visit more business blogs for guides and tips.You can be friends with me. Please come visit my site Special Event Marketing when you got time. Thanks.
Car Detailing
Nice blog design. This seems like it would be a very interesting blog to keep up with. Please come visit my site Car Cleaning and give me any valuable feedbacks.
Demint?
Seriously? I am scratching my head as to why Senator DeMint (Cracker - South Carolina) is in any way the face the Rs want pitching their "plan". I'd be interested in why folks here think that makes sense.
I note this post has apparently been spammed by blog-bots (see comments above).
Green Health Care..
Several notable green efforts exist today in the health care field focused on addressing the negative environmental impacts of hospital resource use and disposal. These important hospital-based initiatives promote the use of safer medical supplies and materials, and the reduction of toxic medical waste. What has been overlooked is the important role of primary health care practitioners operating in small- to medium-sized clinics.
A huge national concern......
Health care is a huge national concern. There's a lot of talk about health care reform, and the industry does need it, especially since so many people that are only after the most basic of care have to get emergency cash loans to cover something as simple as a simple antibiotics script, and a full third of the nation is without health insurance. The lead researcher for the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, Elliot Fisher, a practitioner for over 20 years, has pointed out that areas that spend more on health care interestingly spend more on unnecessary procedures, and have higher mortality rates. So why do we need payday cash advances for health care that is worse when more expensive?
Public health plan vs. Private
The private sector is able to operate with far more efficiency than public, that isn't in any kind of doubt at all. However, a lot of people are concerned with an aspect that a lot of conservatives just won't acknowledge as being an issue, which is the ethical dilemma of health care. Granted, everybody has a right to profit, but the thing about medicine is that the power of life and death comes into question, and that does not see, like something that should be subject to avarice, and it has been proven time and again that business interests are routinely put above issues of life and death - for instance, Nestle and their replacement for breast milk in Africa, which locks poor people into having to buy formula which shouldn't actually be given to infants until they are over 6 months of age to begin with. Avarice and profit are, of course, two different things. Profit is merely the amount (by either actaul count or percentage) of income less expenditures. Since profit is the motive of all business ventures, profit in and of itself is not an evil, whereas avarice, or greed, whatever you choose to call it, is the motive for profit above all other things, and when you have a for profit structure applied to medicine, or any other industry in which life and death become concerns, then any motive for profit has to be strictly checked against the potential for disaster. You cannot justify people dying so a few rich people can cash some bigger checks. That is tyranny, period - and tyranny is tyranny no matter how you slice it, whether it's governmental tyranny, or the kind of tyranny that is given license, and in fact legitimacy by the government at so many turns it's sickening, which is corporate tyranny - corporations having mroe rights than the actual citizens, and quite frankly, the record of our business establishments tends to speak for itself, and in no way should they be granted power over life and death, in any way shape or form. If there were a way for private health care to stay viable and remain the primary method of delivering health care to our citizens, then it should remain so. However, it is starting to appear that pay or die is the modus operandi, and someone who values human life and the quality of that life, then there is few justifications for opposing a public health plan. You just can't. Besides, when you really think about it, hasn't the medical trade gotten rich enough already? And the people that rake in the cash aren't the people that do the work, i.e. doctors and especailly not the people who do the heavy lifting, the nurses? It isn't justifiable any more, especialyl if we're going to be on this "We're the greatest country in the world" kick and not have ANYTHING to show for it.
What Should The Plan Include?
May be it should include some weight loss program: Atkins, South Beach ..ect...... cause too many are overweight.