| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Family Told Obama NOT To Wear Soldier Son's Bracelet… Yet He Still Does?
Barack Obama played the "me too" game during the Friday debates on September 26 after Senator John McCain mentioned that he was wearing a bracelet with the name of Cpl. Matthew Stanley, a resident of New Hampshire and a soldier that lost his life in Iraq in 2006. Obama said that he too had a bracelet. After fumbling and straining to remember the name, he revealed that his had the name of Sergeant Ryan David Jopek of Merrill, Wisconsin.
Shockingly, however, Madison resident Brian Jopek, the father of Ryan Jopek, the young soldier who tragically lost his life to a roadside bomb in 2006, recently said on a Wisconsin Public Radio show that his family had asked Barack Obama to stop wearing the bracelet with his son's name on it. Yet Obama continues to do so despite the wishes of the family.
Radio host Glenn Moberg of the show "Route 51" asked Mr. Jopek, a man who believes in the efforts in Iraq and is not in favor of Obama's positions on the war, what he and his ex-wife think of Obama continually using their son's name on the campaign trail.
Jopek began by saying that his ex-wife was taken aback, even upset, that Obama has made the death of her son a campaign issue. Jopek says his wife gave Obama the bracelet because "she just wanted Mr. Obama to know Ryan's name." Jopek went on to say that "she wasn't looking to turn it into a big media event" and "just wanted it to be something between Barack Obama and herself." Apparently, they were all shocked it became such a big deal.
**UPDATE - 09/28/08 PM**
But, he also said that his ex-wife has refused further interviews on the matter and that she wanted Obama to stop wearing the reminder of her son's sacrifice that he keeps turning into a campaign soundbyte. This begins at about 10 minutes into the radio program. (Download radio show HERE)
TRANSCRIPT
Brian Jopek: Because of some of the negative feedback she's gotten on the Internet, you know Internet blogs, you know people accusing her of... or accusing Obama of trying to get votes doing it... and that sort of thing.
Radio Host Moberg: Yeah
Jopek: She has turned down any subsequent interviews with the media because she just didn't want it to get turned into something that it wasn't. She had told me in an email that she had asked, actually asked Mr. Obama to not wear the bracelet any more at any of his public appearances. Which I don't think he's...
Moberg: It has been a while since he's brought it up.
Jopek: Right. But, the other night I was watching the news and he was on, uh, speaking somewhere and he was still wearing it on his right wrist. I could see it on his right wrist. So, that's his own choice. I mean that's something Barack Obama, that's a choice that he continues to wear it despite Tracy asking him not to... Because she is a Barack Obama supporter and she didn't want to do anything to sabotage his campaign, so, if he's still wearing the bracelet then, uh, that of course is entirely up to him.
Moberg: Maybe there's a difference between wearing it and making a point to bring it up in your speeches?
Even the snow job that the radio host tried to pull off to cover for Barack's refusing the wishes of the family of the KIA soldier who's bracelet he wears doesn't pass the smell test. After all, now that Obama has made it a big point in the debates, I guess the silent observance of Sgt. Jopek is no longer so silent and Obama is back to exploiting the death of a soldier even when he was asked NOT to do so by that soldier's parents.
To pile insult onto injury here, the Mother doesn't even want to force the issue of telling Obama to stop exploiting her son because she wants to see him win the election. Obama is not only taking advantage of this brave soldier's death, he is taking advantage of the good wishes of the man's Mother who doesn't want to hurt the campaign.
This all makes Obama look pretty calculating and blood chillingly callous, doesn't it?
And, why is the media not playing this story? The radio show on which this interview is heard happened all the way back in March. How is it the media missed this? Is it because they are also don't want to hurt Obama's campaign?
I can only say that if the parents of the soldier whose bracelet John McCain is wearing had said in public that they want him to stop wearing their son's bracelet the news would have been coast to coast, and wall to wall, not just ignored in Madison, Wisconsin.
Obama's use of this soldier that fell in the line of duty is tainted by his ambition and callousness. And the media is letting him get away with it.
**UPDATE**
Jopek Mother Confirms She Asked Obama NOT To Use Bracelet in Campaign
This afternoon the Associated Press was at last able to contact Tracy Jopek, mother of Sergeant Ryan David Jopek, the KIA soldier on the bracelet that Barack Obama is using on the campaign trail. Ryan's Mother is confirming that she gave the bracelet to Mr. Obama, but is also confirming that she asked him to stop using her son's name on the campaign.
After Tracy Jopek gave Sen. Barack Obama a bracelet in honor of her son who was killed in Iraq, she asked Obama not to mention the bracelet on the campaign trail.
She did, however, claim that she was "satisfied" with how Obama discussed the bracelet in the presidential debates last week.
But, we have another little mystery with these AP reports. The original headline for this report was "Soldier's mother 'ecstatic' about Obama's bracelet," released at about 7PM the evening of the 28th. But a few hours later, the AP changed it to "Soldier's mom defends Obama's mention of bracelet."
Apparently, Jopek's mother did NOT say she was "ecstatic" about Obama continuing to use her son's name on the campaign trail even after she told him to stop. The AP had to change its headline to reflect the truth.
The fact remains, the woman has repeated that she asked Obama not to mention her son on the campaign trail and this AP report confirms that. Will Obama stop using her son, now that we are sure she said she wanted him to stop?
(H/T Level_Head of www.dehavelle.com)
(Photo credit: Washington Post)
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius' Forum. It's what's happening NOW!


Comments
His EX wife?
Obama mentioned the mother had given this to him, not the father.
Has the mother said anything publicly?
I don't know about you but I wouldn't let an ex talk for me.
Specially since in this case the ex is in favor of McCain and the mother is an Obama supporter.
Either way the whole bracelet
Either way the whole bracelet thing didn't go so well for O. It's a negative for him now. He'd be well advised to take it off and not mention it again.
I agree. Both candidates
I agree. Both candidates were embarassing in that exchange; McCain for his insulting attempt to tug at our heartstrings and Obama for following his lead. They should leave that BS to the People magazine hard-hitting journalism.
Are you going to make a correction?
Hey you big jerk,
why dont you get your facts in a row before you spout off bs:
"Tracy Jopek of Merrill told The Associated Press on Sunday she was honored that he remembered Sgt. Ryan David Jopek, who was killed in 2006 by a roadside bomb.
She criticized Internet reports that suggested Obama exploited her son for political purposes.
She acknowledges e-mailing the campaign in February asking that Obama not mention her son in speeches or debates.
But she says Obama's mention on Friday was appropriate because he was responding after Senator John McCain said a soldier's mother gave him a bracelet.
Jopek says Obama's comment rightfully suggested there's more than one viewpoint on the war."
http://www.nbc15.com/state/headlines/29864149.html
whatever dude,
would you like some cheese with whine?
Truth Hurts
How does "truth" = "whine" ?
PS. I love it how the McCain sheep are determined to make this an "issue". The American economy is collapsing, and McCain wants to talk about a bracelette?! Obama is willing to discuss real and important issues, and that's why Obama will win.
Cheers.
Correction!
Obamam is willing to say and do anything to get his Marxist ass elected. Then it is open season on freedom in this country.
Marxist? Lol... that's
Marxist? Lol... that's rich. Enlighten us as to the nature of Obama's Marxism, oh wise one. Are you referring to a clear distinction of policies benefitting upper class over middle class? You do realize that the 3 week old, outgoing CEO of Washington Mutual banked 13.5 million, right? You don't think there's a class war going on right now? Who do you think is paying that 13.5 mil anyway?
If acknowledging a middle class equals Marxism these days, then I'll proudly sit at Karl's table. Marxism, like many issues that likely make your hard-working brain get all fuzzy, is complex. I'm certain that you probably just pulled that word out of your Bill O'Reilly guide to icky issues, but I think you'll find that Marx was looking out for you much more that McCain and his mansion dwelling ilk ever will.
See you in the soup line, comrade.
Well, let see...
Higher taxes, (the middle class tax cut thing is a sham, just like with Clinton, Democrats raise taxes and that includes the "middle class"). Bashing business, protecting Bolshevik thug corrupt union tactics, supporting forced unionism and taking away the secret ballot in unionization elections.
Then there is the whole Unfairness Doctrine thing. You know, to shut down conservative talk radio (since the left can't compete in that medium) and most likely extended it to the internet to conservative sites since leftists are intolerant of opposition thought. They only care about protecting the party line and silencing the critics.
Yes this so-called champion of the middle class is all in favor of its enslavement to the welfare state. That will be achieved by the full socialization of the health care industry. Along with the goverment taking over the banking industry vis-a-vis through so-called bail out schemes (assuming Chairwoman Pelosi can instill party discipline to get it passed).
Yeah comrade, we will all be in the federal souplines with out hands out to the oh, so compassionate government apparatchiks for our dole if the ally of unrepentent, radical Weather Undergound terrorist Bill Ayers and acolyte of black racist Maxist preacher Wright gets in the Whitehouse.
You provided plenty of
You provided plenty of
misinformationmaterial, so excuse me if I miss something.Nobody is getting a tax cut no matter who grabs the reigns. The left is considering no increase for those earning less than 250k and the right is offering *ahem* incentives for those commanding GNP level dollar amounts. The bailout, whatever form it takes, means all bets are off for both parties. Expect to see an increase in taxes not directly proportionate to your decrease in pay. Which leads me to...
The left and their love of big government. I wish we had had a bit more government intervention with Fannie and Freddie. I think if you crack open that dusty, unused history book you use to prop up your gun rack, you would find that governmental oversight is less costly than the inevitable bail out. I appreciate the utopian mindset of the isolationist conservative/libertarian, but not every business person has evolved a sense of responsibility.
Unfairness Doctrine... I have no idea what this is, but the existence of Fox News tells me that ultra-conservatives have the means to make their voice heard. There are much more compelling issues to worry about than conservative talk radio... use the internets.
Obama isn't a champion of the middle class, but he recognizes that there is one.
If you're uncomfortable with an increased availability to health care, don't avail yourself of it. Nobody is talking about making it mandatory, just available. Again, this is a case where prevention is cheaper than dealing with the fallout. You're paying more to offset insurance-less patients now than you would be to support a health care rollout. There's plenty of resource material out there to back that up if you feel like looking.
I have no idea what "apparatchiks" is. Give me a second on google...
"It is also frequently used to describe individuals, appointed to positions in any government, on the basis of ideological or political loyalty rather than competence."
Ha! Holy moly golly gee... That doesn't describe Palin at all, now does it? You may need to dig deeper into your bag of Limbaughisms for these topsy-turvy times.
Let's not go the preacher of candidate route... both parties are dealing with potential embarassments in that area. I'm guessing there are more Marxists than witch-hunters these days.
Pelosi and the Dems didn't block the bail, btw... that was an effort by the house republicans. I'm a bit confused on where you stand with the bail out as you chide it in the beginning, but blame the democrats for blocking it by the end. This issue is causing an identity crisis for both parties, though, so I understand your dilemma.
The only jerk here is
The only jerk here is you.
I sleep during the day as I am a night shift worker. I am updating now.
Jerk.
OUCH!
Warner Todd Huston, You've been PWNED!! Good work, jps!
Hey, maybe next time someone here receives a bogus eMail talking point from a McCain liar or surrogate, they won't be so quick to the post?
Naaaah.
No one here cares about credibility, it's all about "message discipline", right?!! LOL!
The failures of Warner Todd Huston
"This all makes Obama look pretty calculating and blood chillingly callous, doesn't it?"
No, it absolutely does not. You are applying what the kids call "spin" to an uncomplicated situation in order to bolster a weak argument. This is a technique famously employed by hack blog editorialists and Karl Rove devotees. Yours is not a very effective application of this, Mr. Warner Todd Huston, as you have included material in your editorial that conflicts with your assumption. Practice makes perfect; I'm sure you'll keep at it, little trooper.
This and many more rhetorical questions that you pose can be answered by request.
Snicker. Should I feel
Snicker. Should I feel "shame" now that some halfwit on a webvsite called me a name?? Hope you aren't too disappointed.