| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Lies Used to Support Card Check
The Shop Floor is reporting once again on the lies that the SEIU is using to try and cajole people into thinking that the Wall Street Journal supports the Employee Free Choice Act, today. But now that story has taken a twist. It appears that the House Education and Labor Committee is using the same lie.
Originally the SEIU surgically removed a few words from the WSJ article to make it seem as if the Journal was somehow supporting the EFCA. On what the WSJ said, the SEIU wrote the following:
"The bill doesn’t remove the secret-ballot option from the National Labor Relations Act," wrote the WSJ.
Only that isn't really what the WSJ said at all. Here is the full sentence the Journal wrote in its headlined "Unionize or die" (my bold for emphasis):
"The bill doesn’t remove the secret-ballot option from the National Labor Relations Act but in practice makes it a dead letter."
So, in essence the WSJ was saying that the EFCA eliminates the secret ballot in everything but words.
Well, not content to let the SEIU have all the fun, Chairman George Miller (D, CA) of the House Education and Labor Committee used the same misleading, incomplete WSJ quote in a Committee E-Newsletter quiz. It is also posted online.
So, now government officials are using the same mangled Wall Street Journal quote to lie their way into pulling the wool over the eyes of the American people.
Wonderful. What won't these people do to get their way?
Be sure and Visit my Home blog Publius' Forum. It's what's happening NOW!


Comments
Thank you for admitting the lie
Thank you for FINALLY stepping up and admitting that Newt, Saul Anuzis and you were peddling a lie in your previous posts:
Saul Anuzis, 3/07/09 (on a paid assigment from Newt Gingrich)
Warner Todd Huston, 3/10/09
Warner Todd Huston, 3/15/09
I almost feel a little sorry for you, WTH. You clearly bought the lie that Newt and Saul were peddling and simply regurgitated it, and now that it has been exposed, you've got egg on your face as well. Hence your furious spinning.
Here's an idea - next time listen to BOTH sides of an argument before putting the key into the ignition of your bombast machine. Those of us who aren't reflexively hostile to the idea of worker's rights recognized Newt's formulation was a lie as soon as he came up with it, because we knew more about what the actual content of the bill was.
Are you
Are you as stupid as you seem, NotRightNimload? I mean, really? Is it English you don't understand?
Wow, that's telling him WTH...
What a clever comeback! Name-calling and non-responsive insults really make your point.
I thought it was as clever and witty
as the original post was relevant and useful.
Well, acinphx, by replying to
Well, acinphx, by replying to NotRightNimload at all was more effort than is due him.
So you are shocked...
...shocked, I say, to suddenly find out that someone has the audacity to not quite quote the quote to make it fit into their own agenda -- well, I never.
Nevertheless, even the whole quote pretty much substantiates the fact that good, old Saul and you have lied about the EFCA from the beginning.
ex animo
davidfarrar