| About Us | Contact | Donate | User Blogs | Login |
Recent blog posts
lgm
0 comments
Skip MacLure
0 comments
In between
0 comments
Ironman
4 comments
John Smith
0 comments
Anita MonCrief
2 comments
Wayne from Jere...
0 comments
John Smith
2 comments
lgm
30 comments
Skip MacLure
3 comments
Recent comments
-
venn99
-
venn99
-
venn99
-
Remains of the ...
-
John Smith
Search
Links
The American Scene
Conservablogs
Election Projection
FiveThirtyEight.com
Jonathan Martin
Marc Ambinder
Megan McArdle
Patrick Ruffini
Pollster.com
The Foundry
Government Bytes
Race 4 2008
Real Clear Politics
RedState
Ross Douthat
Soren Dayton
Infrastructure
America's Future Foundation
Americans for Prosperity
Americans for Tax Reform
American Majority
Club for Growth
Election Journal
Heritage Foundation
ATR Blog
Leadership Institute
NewsBusters
Sam Adams Alliance
Republican National Lawyers Association
Republican Liberty Caucus
Washington Watch
National Taxpayers Union
NetRight Nation
Good Lefty Blogs
MyDD
Open Left
Swing State Project


Comments
I voted for Sarah Palin
Mainly because she is Hawt
I won't lie
Palin
She recently had a down syndrome and she knew from the early months and still had the baby. she is really pro life!
http://houseguru.blogspot.com/
WOW
This I did not know. this is very good
Me too
I voted for Sarah Palin, not so much out of a deep, passionate advocacy for her specifically, but assuming Obama is the Democrat nominee, I think a woman on the GOP ticket is much smarter than a minority (no offense to the bright, up-and-coming Bobby Jindal). Lots of women in the Democratic party believe - rightly or not -- that Obama's nomination is a result of sexism, or that they were denied their opportunity to "shatter the last glass ceiling." In short, there are lots of women out there who are disgruntled with the Democrats. Many of them will get in line behind their nominee, but some will not.
Putting a minority on the ticket as a response to Obama's nomination has us playing on the Democrats' terms, trying to out-minority them, what Barry Goldwater would have called "me too Republicanism." Putting a woman on has the potential to stimulate one of Obama's weaknesses and possibly pull in some new voters, much as we did in 1968 and 1980.
Not that I'm in favor of building our ticket around identity politics; but if we're going to do that, we might as well be smart about it.
All things considered...
All things considered, Romney is the most strategic choice.
What Romney will do
Is Help McCain in the Deseret States (Utah, Idaho, Nevada) and probably his other other home state (Michigan)
but will the baggage be to much, thats the question
The baggage
You mean the Mormon issue?
No. He gave a pretty decent speech defending his faith already. He'll be fine.
No no not the mormon issue
And Romney played the Antimormon card like a fiddel more often then not.
No I mean the fact his signature accomplishment in Massachucetts is choking his states government. The fact he signed off on a plan thats government paid for abortion on demand. the fact he could have stopped gay marriage in massachucetts and didn't.
Ah, yes. You notice he tried
Ah, yes.
You notice he tried to distance himself from his health care plan - the one he was once so proud of - during the campaign. The fact that his health care plan ended up costing so much more than projected and saddling the state with debt really got surprisingly little publicity.
Yeah
but in a General election campaign it'd get blown up
Romney doesn't bring much to the table
Help McCain in the Desert States (Utah, Idaho, Nevada)
Where McCain doesn't need help.
Romney will re-enforce and add to McCain's negatives with the base, voters that we need in swing states and for down-ticket races.
Exactly
Romney hurts us with Hispanics, low-scale voters, evangelicals, and others. So he would hurt us with the people that we need to win...
Why would we wrap that albatross around our necks?
Mike Pence
Should be on this list.
JC Watts
nuff said
ha!
That's funny. "We have black people, too!"
He wrote a column recently on the importance of the social conservatives: http://www.lvrj.com/opinion/18312754.html
I've heard he's starting his own news network.
The way he's going, he's
The way he's going, he's going to have to dig up Ronald Reagan and run him as a handpuppet if he's going to get MY vote...
Too Early
I have been saying this for months to scores of friends and family members, but I still believe that it is too early for VP speculation. The conservative blogosphere and MSM writers have been so focused on this question for far too long when it is really a non-issue. The VP candidate may pick up some votes in the general election, but beyond that the vice presidency does not matter that much. Some would argue that it may be more so now with McCain's age, etc. but I've always that was an excuse the MSM and pundits used to justify even discussing this topic.
Instead of writing on this topic, conservative thinkers, writers, and opinion leaders should actually be discussing the issues. For instance, rather than going back and forth over so-and-so's advantages and disadvantages as a VP, we should be writing things like John Hinderaker's post on Powerline over the weekend entitled "Are We Safe?" and therefore pick apart the message delivered by the Junior Senator from Illinois. Or we should be articulating our plan to address energy policy in this country. We could also be dreaming up new ideas and policies (what a concept!) such as controlling the ballooning cost of higher education.
Rather than casting a positive vision and thereby motivating the base and attracting new adherents, we're merely dithering over this question over and over again. The more and more I think about it, the more I enjoy Senator McCain's recent comments on the Daily Show in which he told Jon Stewart he would name Dwight Schrutte (a character from the TV show The Office for those readers unfamiliar with the best comedy on screen today) as his running mate. McCain dealt with the question as it should be at this point: dismissing it as out of hand while we have bigger fish to fry.
Duuuude
You don't think McCain wrote that line, do you? Clearly, he hadn't the faintest farging idea who Dwight Schrute is -- that in itself is kind of scary. Would you read a joke handed to you by Jon Stewart's staff without knowing exactly what it meant?
Of course not. I was just
Of course not. I was just trying to make the broader point on how silly the speculation is at this point.
Other Options?
Really, Michael Steele should not be on this list. I like Steele and all, but he's needed in Maryland and is not yet qualified for the #2 spot.
Other options that should have been on this list? Rudy Giuliani, Mike Pence, Sam Brownback, JC Watts, Joe Lieberman. I may not like all these options, but people do and McCain may, so they should be at least considered. Especially over the likes of Condi Rice, Rick Perry, or Michael Steele who I doubt are anywhere near any short list.
McCain's VP Choice
I believe Sarah Paline will be a good choice for Vice President. She will help get the women's vote and is very strong on pro life. She seems very savy and knowledgeable and capable. One choice that I hope McCain doesn't make is Huckabee. The media and the public have more or less swept his comment under the carpet about someone taking a shot at Obama at the NRA gathering. But if he were to be chosen as McCain's running mate, this tasteless joke will not be ignored, and you can bet it will be brought up big time, which will definitely limit McCain's chances. Look at what happened when George Allen very innocently mentioned the word, "Macacaw." This was far less offensive than what Huckabee said, and Huckabee was very much aware of what he was saying just for the sake of a few laughs. Not good. Yes, Huckabee apologized, but so did George Allen. If the public condemned George Allen for his far less offensive remark even after he apologized, do you think they will let Huckabee off the hook for making a much more offensive remark?
Huckabee is the best choice
Huckabee apologized for his poor attempt at humor. Anyone that thinks Huckabee is a racist doesn't know how hard Huckabee has fought for racial unity and fairness. Read "Why black voters love Mike Huckabee" on The Values Voter's Blog. Mike Huckabee has 10 1/2 years chief executive experience as Governor. He still has a 65% approval rating. He has the grassroots support that McCain will be able to tap into. He can help with the religious right that hasn't jumped on board the McCain express. McCain also needs help in the not so safe anymore southern states. McCain and Huckabee actually like and respect each other.
You ARE kidding, right? You
You ARE kidding, right? You can't possibly believe that Huck's bad joke apologized for to Obama himself who said he thought nothing of it, could possibly be a topic in the election!!! If that's all they could dig up on Huckabee I say he must be near perfect. How could a joke be used in an election??? You are grasping at straws here and obviously are either a democrat (they are afraid of going against McCain/Huckabee because of all the USA survey results showing McCian/Huckabee beating McCain with Romney, Pawlenty or Lieberman. If not, you are a Romney supporter., These are the only two categories who would possibly try and use that joke business against Huck. If you don't have any real dirt to use, make up something.......One of the many things folks love about Huckabee is his great sense of humor and his willingness to admit a mistake and take ownership. This made him all the more respected. We all make mistakes, it's how we handle them that tells our character. Huck passed with flying colors and is a class act.....
Flawed Reasoning
No, I am not a Democrat. And I don't feel Romney should be McCain's choice; not that I don't think Romney is qualified, but because I think there are other fully qualified choices that would be more strategic to McCain in helping him win--Sarah Palin or Bobby Jindahl come to mind. But I find it quite humorous that you chose to believe that because I am critical of Huckabee I must be a Romney supporter. Using this same flawed reasoning, am I or anyone else to automatically assume that anytime a person is critical of Romney, that person who is critical of him is an avid Huckabee supporter? But I could make a list of other reasons I don't feel Huckabee is qualified. I am just focusing on this one aspect. His joke at the NRA is not the only time Huckabee has made an inappropriate wisecrack. For example, the joke about him staying at a Holiday Inn Express when asked about his foreign policy experience. I don't think he uses wise judgement in when he should be serious or when he shouldn't make offensive remarks on sensitive subjects. I would not like someone who makes careless remarks like this to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. We can't expect people to never make a mistake in what they say, but this seems to be a pattern with Huckabee. For the record, when he made the remark about Jesus being smart enough to not run for public office; that was very funny and certainly was not offensive.
Humor is an admirable quality
Huckabee has a great sense of humor that endears him to all. If you don't recognize his qualities, you have simply not taken the time to look into his record. This man could not have gotten re-elected twice in a democratic state, been voted one of the top 5 best governors in the US, been nominated by his peers to be Chairman of the Natn'l Governors Association and, even now hold a 65% positive approval rating in democratic Arkansas (oh, yeah, he got 48% of black votes, most rep. get 10%) unless he had an impeccable record. Maybe you should take a closer look at Mike. The Republican brand is broken. McCain and Huckabee have pioneered a "new Brand" of Republican, not mad, not negative, each with a broader view of helping the environment, same views on health care, compatibility. If you want a winning ticket, you have it with McCain/Huckabee.
But
But Huckabee would alienate the cross-party support that is one of McCain's greatest strengths. Much is made of Obamas "transcendent" apeal. But the lesser-told story is that McCain has as much or more cross-party support, and he did even before the Dems started threatening to vote for him merely out of spite.
cross-party support
McCain should start worrying about getting "cross-party support" from the Republicans. His decades long outreach to non Republicans is a matter of record. The VP slot needs to help him pick up people on the right, something he can't do himself.
Right. And there are
Right. And there are potential VPs who can do that without alienating McCain's moderate support. Huckabee is not one of them.
Romney is fine with me.
I just don't like kow-towing to the anti-Christian bigots.
Equating the anti-Huckabee
Equating the anti-Huckabee sentiment with bigotry toward Christianity may be a bit of a stretch. Most Christians would never have made some of the comments Huckabee has made.
Mike Huckabee
The Democrats will vote in this poll for Mitt Romney, because that is who they would most like to face in the general election. His wealth, inauthenticity, and ties to the Club for Growth make him an easy target for Democrats bent on reform of the government. If John McCain is to have any chance to become President, he must choose Mike Huckabee as his running mate. On a more level playing field, Huckabee would be the Presidential nominee right now. His social conservatism will win the South, but independents in the middle will also like him because he is not an economic conservative.
McCain/Huckabee best possible choice
McCain & Huckabee share the same basic ideology that allows them to work well together (McCain recently remarked at the health care presentation he and Huckabee did together and that he thought it was one of the most illuminating and educational presentations), yet their differences, collectively allow them to unify, solidify and excite the party like nobody else. We have invested our hearts and spirit in these two great men. To ask us to accept anyone else would be cruel and unusual punishment. Huckabee courted the blue collar/middle class from day one and he is the only republican who "gets it" that the brand is broken and needs reinventing. His Fair Tax, health care plan (shares with McCain), immigration stand, strong military stand compatible with McCain. HE is compatible with McCain. Body language experts gave them a 97.7 positve reading, said they was extremely rare and a full 34 pts. higher than McCain with any other potential mate. This speaks volumes about the compatibility of these two. Huck got a whopping 48% of the black vote in Ark. Almost unheard of as most republicans get roughly 10%. He still has 65% approval rating in Ark (those who know him best). Quoted by Time magazine as halving welfare and growing the economy in Arkansas above national average as just two ot the reasons he was named one of top 5 best governors in the US.
Huckabee is perhaps the worst possible choice
The Democrats made it a point to hold their fire on Huckabee in January. They were praying that Huckabee might win the nomination so that they could run commercials of Wayne DuMond's victims' families 24 hours a day every day until the election.
McCain does need someone that will appeal to social conservatives, but he needs someone who won't turn off the moderates and fiscal conservatives.
Romney's health care plan
Please read up on the health care plan Romney implemented in Mass. It has been disastrous and is getting alot of negative publicity. Has been in the news several times lately. It is similar to what the democrats are proposing so it will be brought up time and time again going into the fall to show that what the democrats propose will not work. This reflects negatively on Romney, who has self-proclaimed to be great on economics and a great businessman. This, coupled with the reckless way he ran his campaign millions and millions of dollars in the red, getting less votes per $ spent than any candidate does not fare well. Romney and McCain do not share the same ideology and there is bad blood from the primary with youtube videos all over the place with McCain and Romney criticizing each other on every single issue. Survey USA election poll samples taken this past week show McCain polls better with Huckabee than with Romney, Pawlenty or Lieberman. As Mitt often said, facts are stubborn things.......
From Kansas
Sarah Palin is my choice for Vice President. She has and is coming through for the people of Alaska. She has a phenomenonal 86% very positive approval rating. She is wholesome, conservative, family-oriented, and ethical. She shines beautifully from inside out. I lived in Alaska for a few years. Am back in my home State of Kansas now. Wish we had Sarah here to clean up ethical issues and big spending. We definitely need her in Washington, D.C.
MCCAIN VP
I voted for "other", only because Condi has emphatically refused the VP nod. I would like to see J.C. Watts, former OK Congressman. He's younger than Johnny Mac, very conservative and articulates it extremely well and, should it matter, is African-American. Let's not let the MSM select out VP as they have our choice for Pres!
VP choice
Mike Huckabee is the only possible choice for John McCain. Mitt Romney may be a great guy at home, but he is a symbol of what is wrong with America. He is supported by the economic conservatives who believe in the kind of free market economy that concentrates wealth in the hands of the few while impoverishing the many, and adds to the national debt, because they care more about their multinational corporations than they do about our country. The amoral SOBs like Karl Rove must be driven out of the government , and the special interests put in their place. In the 19th and early 20th Century, men of conscience stepped forward and checked monopolists like Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, and Carnegie, and saved America. It is time to do it again. Turn John McCain over to Mike Huckabee. Then, he'll have the strength and courage to deal with the fat cats. America is for the people, not the exploiters of the people.
Nothing wrong with being economically conservative.
Who do you think will abolish travesties of justice like the income tax and all other confiscatory taxes, if not the economic conservatives?
The problem with romney is he isn't even a real economic conservative, he's just like osama, er i mean obama barack hussein, he goes whereever the "power" is, he doesn't really have any real principles.
All Things Considered
All things considered, Mitt Romney flip-floppled more than a hamburger on a grill during the primaries and lost the respect of too many people with enough common sense to see that he is your typical politician who will say what he thinks the people want to hear.
"Tell me lies, tell me lies"... there is a theme song that has these lyrics.
...
...oh no no you can't disguise...
Romney redefines flipflopping. I couldn't stand him as a presidential candidate. He was like a slick-haired car salesman. A very very rich car salesman. But I do think the fact that he pulls Nevada and Michigan is enough to win him the VP nod. It also doesn't hurt that he resonates with many of the hard-core social conservatives. I'm sure the social conservatives would prefer to see Huckabee, but that just ain't going to happen.
Non Starters
2 names head that list....Romney and Huckabee in no particular order....they both would be like an albatross around John's neck....I perfer Portman plus he's from Ohio which is still going to be a swing state that John could pick up
That's well and fine
but I don't believe Portman's on McCain's short list. I could be wrong, of course.
If I were playing blackjack,
If I were playing blackjack, I'd call for a new deck.
You forgot someone.
You people forgot Tom Tancredo and Alan Keyes.
These two were the most conservative socially and economically among all the presidential candidates.
One of these two should be the presidential candidate of the GOP, er i mean vice presidential candidate. ;)
Fred Thompson
Fred Thompson was the most reliably consistent across-the-board conservative candidate for POTUS, but that doesn't automatically make him the best choice for VP.
Fred Thompson ran an
Fred Thompson ran an interesting campaign. He declared his candidacy to great acclaim, but then it was like he didn't actually want to be running for president. It was very odd.
He's too old to be McCain's running mate. McCain will have to go with someone younger.
Lisa,
Agreed. Agreed. Maybe; see below.
Agreed. Agreed.
"Odd" depends on your perspective. In fact, Senator Thompson did not want to be running for president. He was genuinely coaxed into it by people who knew him well and believed in his intelligence, wisdom, character, and vision enough to realize that he would make a truly great president. If only he'd made a better candidate. He's not the kind of intellect that always has a ready sound bite for the next camera in his face. Instead, he actually thought through some outstanding ideas and sound solutions to vexing problems, based on principles firmly held by not only him, but most hard-working Americans.
Never mind, though, I guess. It's 2008. "Odd" has been redefined.
Mitt Romney will guarantee a
Mitt Romney will guarantee a McCain win in Michigan, have pull with Mormons in Nevada and Colorado, and will also make Massachusets competitive. I therefore voted for him.
I also like Eric Cantor. Bobby Jindal's youth disqualifies him, and I don't even think he should want to be on this ticket.
I will not vote for a ticket with Mike Huckabee on it. He once said, "I know people say that the math doesn't work out. Folks, I didn't major in math. I majored in miracles, and I still believe in those too".
I think he is completely ridiculous. (full disclosure: I am a math major)
He *is* completely
He *is* completely ridiculous. Of course, I'm also a math major, so perhaps we're biased. There are any number of reasos Mr. Huckabee should not be on the ticket...I'm surprised to see he received so many votes in the informal poll here.
The math works well for Romney. I think it's the fact that he'll pull Nevada and Michigan that will put him on the ballot. Swinging Massachusetts is less likely - it's my understanding that Romney's popularity there declines by the month, and anyhow it's one of the most liberal states in the Union.
Need a subtraction key here
We ought to make sure we consider whether a VP choice will take voters off the table we might otherwise be able to get .
Huckabee; Social issue moderates and secular fiscal conservatives are not going to warm to a southern Baptist preacher. Given the inadequate numbers we got in '04 in Montgomery County, PA and Oakland County, MI, we are left trying to glue the '04 electoral map back together, as NH will be out of reach.
Romney: Obviously helps in MI, and that matters; but are there enough evangelicals on the outs with Mormons to covertly jeopardize another important state?
Sanford: He's sort of a less vocal Huckabee in a sense as he is still a southern white protestant male. Might not turn off northern swing voters the way a Baptist minister might, but doesn't add much either. There's an opportunity cost here
Rice: Isn't this going to force Iraq War skeptics who hereofore have been pro-McCain to jump ship?
It seems Pawlenty and Crist are pretty "safe" picks in this regard, but I await further information